On 9/25/07, Chris Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, one option might be something like:
http://www.cpanforum.com/tags/name/helpwanted
Gabor, would it be easy to add an Atom/RSS feed for a particular tag?
Please no! Let's not spread module metadata around any more than we have to.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:54:12AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:00:59 -0700, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Most CPAN smoke testers wouldn't have caught it because even though they
often
run alphas they usually don't install them. So the
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:04:14 -0700, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Well, the repository trunk is always kept at passing so if folks want to
smoke
with that it's safe.
Smoking repositories is not comparable with smoking release
candidates. The number of possible collisions
On 9/23/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would have the absolute latest release, even devs. You could set your CPAN.pm
to pull from one or the other.
If it goes this way, I'd at least want a command or something that
lets me act against the alpha list as a one-off without having
This release unfixes a bug. 0.71 fixed a bug where if you ran a use_ok()
inside a BEGIN block without a plan it would silently fail and the test would
continue. For example...
use Test::More;
plan tests = 10;
BEGIN { use_ok(Some::Module) }
It looks like you planned
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:46:19 Ovid wrote:
This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use release
devel versions so that these issues become less serious in the future?
In your experience, do devel versions get the kind of testing that would catch
these issues
--- chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:46:19 Ovid wrote:
This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use release
devel versions so that these issues become less serious in the
future?
In your experience, do devel versions get the kind of
On Thursday 20 September 2007 00:15:31 Ovid wrote:
In your experience, do devel versions get the kind of testing that
would catch these issues sufficiently?
In my experience, they don't.
For something as high profile as Test::Simple, it would get much more
exposure than most modules.
--- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of this I'm TEMPORARILY rolling the fix back at least a week
to give
CPAN authors a little breathing room to make their fixes. The fix is
usually to plan in a BEGIN block.
This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use
