Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread Smylers
Dave Rolsky writes: I'm still trying to decide between sticking with WWW::Map or switching to WWW::MapService. How about WebService::Map? Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help implement

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-10 01:02]: Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not generating HTML or anything like

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread Chris Josephes
What about WWW::Service::Map??? That would seem to fit. On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, David Wheeler wrote: On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: This'd be great _except_ that www.maplink.com is the website for a map/travel book company. Too

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Smylers wrote: How about WebService::Map? Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help implement generic webby things (in WWW::) from those which are an interface to a

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread David Wheeler
On Jul 9, 2004, at 8:46 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: WWW::MapLinker? That implies that it's a module that performs an action (linking), as opposed to a module that is something (a link). WWW::MapLink, then. David

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread Randy W. Sims
Dave Rolsky wrote: On Fri, 10 Jul 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote: Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not generating HTML or

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-10 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 08:46:31AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Smylers wrote: How about WebService::Map? Search the [EMAIL PROTECTED] archives for WebService and you'll see that there have been recent attempts to distinguish between modules that help implement

ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread Dave Rolsky
Da pod ... NAME WWW::Map - An API for generating links to online map services SYNOPSIS use WWW::Map; my $map = WWW::Map-new( country = 'usa', address = '100 Some Street', city= 'Testville',

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread David Wheeler
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:23 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote: So, I'd propose something like ::MapService instead. I think that conjures up the right image immediately. Or ::MapLink. Regards, David

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Dana Hudes wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, A. Pagaltzis wrote: WWW::Map - An API for generating links to online map services (you guessed right!). So, I'd propose something like ::MapService instead. I think that conjures up the right image immediately. Still not

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread David Wheeler
On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: This'd be great _except_ that www.maplink.com is the website for a map/travel book company. Too confusing. WWW::MapLinker? D

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread Scott W Gifford
Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not generating HTML or anything like that.

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 10 Jul 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote: Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web stuff, not generating HTML or anything like

Re: ANNOUNCE: WWW::Map 0.01

2004-07-09 Thread Scott W Gifford
Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 10 Jul 2004, Scott W Gifford wrote: Right now I'm leaning towards either keeping WWW::Map or going with WWW::MapService. I think the former is actually reasonably clear given the WWW namespace, which is all about interacting with web