On 11-Sep-16 18:19, Lincoln A Baxter wrote:
> Having followed this discussion (more or less, I have no clue what the
> MiuneMcCluskey alorithm is), but I like Logic::Minimise
>
> Lincoln
Quine-McCluskey is used to simplify boolean functions. It's similar to
Karnaugh maps, which may be familiar
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 02:46:18PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> - The correct spelling is Logic::Minimise
Try searching for "minimise" at oed.com. See also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling
But in summary, "minimise" is an acceptable alternative spelling for
"minimize", both are
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:44:13PM +0100, Smylers wrote:
> Paul Johnson writes:
>
> > To be clear, my tongue was firmly in my cheek for that last
> > suggestion, but that doesn't seem to travel too well over SMTP.
>
> Sure, I realized it was a cheeky suggestion.
>
> But there are enough UK folk
Paul Johnson writes:
> To be clear, my tongue was firmly in my cheek for that last
> suggestion, but that doesn't seem to travel too well over SMTP.
Sure, I realized it was a cheeky suggestion.
But there are enough UK folk about who complain about -ize being “an
Americanism” that there might've
To be clear, my tongue was firmly in my cheek for that last suggestion,
but that doesn't seem to travel too well over SMTP. And the myriad
smileys which adorned my initial message seem to have been similarly
lost.
3/10 must try harder
(Smylers, well done on avoiding the past participle of
Paul Johnson writes:
> - The Logic namespace looks like a mess, but I think this module would
>fit better in there: Logic::Minimize
> - The correct spelling is Logic::Minimise
UK English allows both -ize and -ise endings on many verbs*; USA English
only has -ize. So picking the one that's
On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 14:46 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 05:58:35AM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> > * John M. Gamble [2016-09-09 22:12]:
> > > Technically it's math, but I suspect people would be more likely
> to use
> > > the keyword 'boolean', or
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 05:58:35AM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * John M. Gamble [2016-09-09 22:12]:
> > Technically it's math, but I suspect people would be more likely to use
> > the keyword 'boolean', or perhaps 'digital logic', when looking for
> > something like
* John M. Gamble [2016-09-09 22:12]:
> Technically it's math, but I suspect people would be more likely to use
> the keyword 'boolean', or perhaps 'digital logic', when looking for
> something like this.
>
> (For supporting evidence, the Wikipedia article on the Quine-McCluskey
otential problem is that Boolean isn't used much as a top-level
>> name. I can only find 'boolean', the pragma for using true and false
>> values, and Boolean-String, which has a 0.01 release and hasn't been
>> updated since.
>>
>> So are there any objections to my using Boolean as a top level name in
>> earnest?
>>
>> -john
>>
>>
>
h has a 0.01 release and hasn't been
> updated since.
>
> So are there any objections to my using Boolean as a top level name in
> earnest?
>
> -john
>
>
and hasn't been
updated since.
So are there any objections to my using Boolean as a top level name in
earnest?
-john
12 matches
Mail list logo