At 01:56 PM 7/29/02 +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
At 10:44 AM 7/29/02 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Thread::Needs isn't a very descriptive name - it's too general.
Something like Thread::NeedsModules would be better.
I have been thinking maybe it should be called Thread::Modules;
use Thread::Modules
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:38:56AM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 01:56 PM 7/29/02 +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
At 10:44 AM 7/29/02 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
Thread::Needs isn't a very descriptive name - it's too general.
Something like Thread::NeedsModules would be better.
I have been
