On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Cottenceau gcott...@gmail.com wrote:
Kartik and friends rewrote SDL_perl (a Perl module with SDL bindings)
using a different API. Then they ported my Perl-based game to using
that new Perl module, and to be CPAN-friendly. My game previous
versions were
Kartik Thakore
On 2010-08-05, at 7:07 AM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Cottenceau gcott...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kartik and friends rewrote SDL_perl (a Perl module with SDL bindings)
using a different API. Then they ported my Perl-based game to
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com wrote:
thia dist_name = in M::B correct?
Yes.
Though maybe I should just implement a feature to add '-TRIAL', since
I'll need that anyway for CPAN Meta 2 support. (Dist::Zilla already
supports -TRIAL).
-- David
# from David Golden
# on Thursday 05 August 2010 08:55:
Though maybe I should just implement a feature to add '-TRIAL', since
I'll need that anyway for CPAN Meta 2 support. (Dist::Zilla already
supports -TRIAL).
Does search.cpan.org understand -TRIAL now? Last I looked, it was
properly
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
Does search.cpan.org understand -TRIAL now? Last I looked, it was
properly handled (i.e. not indexed) by PAUSE, but would leak through in
a few other places where it appears that an assumption was being made
without
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do we make this work?
I get a error doing this.
I think you need to be a lot more specific about this. I'm
beginning to suspect an XY
So how can we force the VERSION for the non CPAN release?
Kartik Thakore
On 2010-08-05, at 3:24 PM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does search.cpan.org understand -TRIAL now? Last I looked, it was
properly
It appears that your use case -- you want to publish the beta version
on CPAN without having the non-beta-testers get it too -- is not
supported by xdg's essay.
I see two possible approaches:
1: leapfrogging. Release the beta versions with version numbers that
are less than the latest release
Kartik Thakore
On 2010-08-05, at 5:11 PM, David Nicol davidni...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that your use case -- you want to publish the beta version
on CPAN without having the non-beta-testers get it too -- is not
supported by xdg's essay.
I dont know where you are getting this from.
With David's (xdg) help we have come up with a simple solution (which should
have been more obvious).
http://github.com/kthakore/frozen-bubble/blob/e5fe8243e67ca552c02099db8f5a274c6171e1b1/lib/Games/FrozenBubble.pm
Please give that a run. The 'display' version is RELEASE_VERSION.
Regards,
Hello,
Is it possible to have
2.2.1beta1 VERSION, for a perl module?
Kartik Thakore
On 2010-08-04, at 2:21 PM, Guillaume Cottenceau gcott...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I dont think you can have that version.
What if
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Cottenceau gcott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hum. This is for an application (a game), not a module, and I want it
to be clearly labelled as a beta release. So fine with There are no
standard conventions for alphanumerics, and you just make life hard
for the
CPAN recognizes _ in the version variable as indicating a development
version. This is easy if you're only releasing regular floating point versions
i.e. 2.2 becomes 2.2_01.
Does this work? I'm not clear on the validity of _ with 2 decimal versions.
our $VERSION = '2.2.1_01';
On Aug 4, 2010,
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:13 PM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to have
2.2.1beta1 VERSION, for a perl module?
It's not advisable.
C.f.
On Aug 4, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:13 PM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to have
2.2.1beta1 VERSION, for a perl module?
It's not
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Kartik Thakore thakore.kar...@gmail.com wrote:
How do we make this work?
I get a error doing this.
I think you need to be a lot more specific about this. I'm
beginning to suspect an XY problem.
Walk us through -- step by step -- what you're trying to
# from Guillaume Cottenceau
# on Wednesday 04 August 2010 13:12:
but I don't see
the big problem for machines and I don't know how to say hey this is
beta only with numbers; especially if 5.005_03 is equivalent to
5.5.30, I don't see how this could be considered to mark it beta/dev
The first
17 matches
Mail list logo
