On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:11:38PM -0700, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
On 8/16/07, Dominique Quatravaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua ben Jore wrote:
caller() is a less-safe kind of operation because it now returns a
hash ref of the
Burak Gürsoy wrote in perl.module-authors :
Hi,
I have a module named Text::Template::Simple (
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Template-Simple/ ) and one of it's tests
(t/05-safe) is dying under 5.9.5:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2007/08/msg576957.html
I don't think that was a desired change
Ok :)
(so I'd rather fix it before 5.10.0 is out.)
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:34 PM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Incompatible change in blead
Hi,
I have a module named Text::Template::Simple (
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Template-Simple/ ) and one of it's tests
(t/05-safe) is dying under 5.9.5:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2007/08/msg576957.html
On 8/16/07, Burak Gürsoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a module named Text::Template::Simple (
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Template-Simple/ ) and one of it's tests
(t/05-safe) is dying under 5.9.5:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2007/08/msg576957.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua ben Jore wrote:
caller() is a less-safe kind of operation because it now returns a
hash ref of the current lexical pragmas. I don't recall why this new
behavior warranted its removal from the default list of safe
opcodes.
Maybe because if
On 8/16/07, Dominique Quatravaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joshua ben Jore wrote:
caller() is a less-safe kind of operation because it now returns a
hash ref of the current lexical pragmas. I don't recall why this new
behavior warranted its
