* Dominique Dumont domi.dum...@free.fr [2013-02-16 09:45]:
As Perl module developer, I'm guilty as charged: I haven't found
a practical way to change $VERSION when a file has actually changed
:-/
Nor should you. One day I’ll write that article, one day…
--
*AUTOLOAD=*_;sub
On 13-02-19 08:30 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
One day I’ll write that article, one day…
You know how they say there is no time like the present... :-)
Do it!
`/anick
On 13-02-16 03:39 AM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2013 19:34:51,yan...@babyl.dyndns.org a écrit :
So, yeah, I've embraced the per-dist version, and
have lived happily ever after...
Well, if you look at that diff [1] provided by CPAN, knowing that only*one*
file was
Le samedi 16 février 2013 17:27:10, vous avez écrit :
... now I'm just thinking wild, wild thoughts, but did anybody at
any time proposed to have, just like $VERSION, a $DISTRIBUTION variable
indicating to which dist the module belongs to? With that, the version
mechanisms could be
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:34:15PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Applying the same version to all modules within a distribution is a non-
obvious precondition for dependency resolution to work 100% reliably in
all edge cases. I have notes for an article about it flying around here
David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk writes:
I'd love to know what those edge cases are, because I can't think of
any.
My guess is this applies to distributions that contain a number of
modules, some (most) of them not relevant to the end user since they're
internal to the distribution. If you
* Lutz Gehlen lrg...@gmx.net [2013-01-09 16:20]:
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have version number and they are all the
same.
Please excuse this digression, but would you be
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Lutz Gehlen lrg...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Gabor,
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have
On Wed, January 9, 2013 9:03 pm, David Christensen wrote:
There seems to be two competing points of view regarding version
numbering for software source code files:
1. Per-file -- a unique version number for each file that increments
when that file changes. RCS and CVS use this approach.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:06:10AM -0600, John M. Gamble wrote:
Yeah, after dithering about it for a few days, I went with the philosophy
that the package has the version, not the individual modules. For the
simple reason that the package as a whole is what's being developed, from
the
Hi Gabor,
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have
version number and they are all the same.
Please excuse this digression, but would you be so kind to explain
why you find this
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Lutz Gehlen lrg...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Gabor,
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have
version number and they are all the same.
Please excuse this
On 01/09/13 07:17, Lutz Gehlen wrote:
Hi Gabor,
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 09:04:31 Gabor Szabo wrote:
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have
version number and they are all the same.
Please excuse this digression, but would you be so
Hi,
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the modules
in a distribution have
version number and they are all the same. I guess Dist::Zilla would do
that, but this distribution
I am patching use Module::Build.
I found Test::HasVersion but as I can see it only checks if there
Hello,
I just wanted to update a distribution and ensure that all the
modules in a distribution have version number and they are all the
same. I guess Dist::Zilla would do that, but this distribution I am
patching use Module::Build.
I found Test::HasVersion but as I can see it only
On 08/01/2013 19:16, Ben Deutsch wrote:
A question of my own: I immediately thought of the single point of
truth idiom, and would have written something like this:
package My::Sub::Module;
use My::Base::Module;
our $VERSION = $My::Base::Module::VERSION;
or similar. Would this trip up some
16 matches
Mail list logo
