On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:08:51AM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Ken Williams wrote:
Agreed - for providing a stable download link of a CPAN package, backpan
is better than CPAN itself. If this could be integrated into the BSD
system itself that would be great.
-Ken
Hi, as a
Hi,
just a heads-up about cleaning up CPAN. I know old versions are always
available from BACKPAN (whatever that is, havent actually checked it out),
but I came across a situation on FreeBSD. For those who dont know, FreeBSD
has an excellent package management system called the ports tree,
David,
I apologize for this inconvenience, I did not realize this happened, I
will be careful about what I delete from now on. However, I think you
might want to email the maintainer of this port and let him/her know
that this is happening so that they can update it.
Thanks,
Stevan
On Apr 1,
David == David Baird [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Hi,
David just a heads-up about cleaning up CPAN. I know old versions are always
David available from BACKPAN (whatever that is, havent actually checked it
out),
David but I came across a situation on FreeBSD. For those who dont know,
On Apr 1, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
These ports are broken then. They should list both the CPAN and the
BACKPAN
as possible source hosts.
Agreed - for providing a stable download link of a CPAN package,
backpan is better than CPAN itself. If this could be integrated into
