On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we should charge by the pound for CPAN modules? Not
lines of code, but some kind of metric which appropriately conveys heft
(toughness/strength/finish are, of course, premium.)
Executions without problem? That
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
# from Jonathan Rockway
# on Tuesday 03 March 2009 10:16:
This is just one of the many things I have been upset with the
treatment of in my Computer Science program--it's way too academic,
and not applied enough, but I
# from David Golden
# on Tuesday 03 March 2009 12:02:
I would expect application of the Science to be found in the
Software Engineering program, but we've got a ways to go yet before
it becomes a professional discipline -- complete with licensing and
responsibility.
You might be interested
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
And nobody ever picks $good, yet they wonder why they get what they get.
I think it's related to difficulty of judging future opportunity
costs. Paying for $good has an immediate cost now over paying for
$decent, but it's
