* Robert Rothenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-29T18:03:09]
On 29/03/2005 22:14 Andy Lester wrote:
Or thrown away entirely, along with the rest of the archaic idea of
module registration.
I'm sympathetic to the idea, but some of the information in DSLIP is
useful and shouldn't be thrown
Ricardo SIGNES writes:
I assume you mean What isn't in META.yml should go in DSLIP.
Why not What isn't in META.yml should go in META.yml?
META.yml sounds much more sensible to me. It wasn't around when DSLIP
was created, but it is now.
Of course, even if we change _where_ this metadata is
* Robert Rothenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-29T14:16:11]
Some food for thought and debate. I'm wondering if the DSLIP codes [1]
be updated, if revamped altogether. Note the following issues:
I vote for eliminated.
--
rjbs
pgpxUKHHyPWvh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:06:33PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:16:11PM +, Robert Rothenberg ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Some food for thought and debate. I'm wondering if the DSLIP codes [1]
be updated, if revamped altogether. Note the following issues:
Or
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:37PM +0100, Tim Bunce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Or thrown away entirely, along with the rest of the the archaic idea of
a module list.
The Module List is dead. Module Registration is different.
Mea culpa. I'll rephrase.
Or thrown away entirely, along with
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:14:46PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:37PM +0100, Tim Bunce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Or thrown away entirely, along with the rest of the the archaic idea of
a module list.
The Module List is dead. Module Registration is different.
On 29/03/2005 22:14 Andy Lester wrote:
Mea culpa. I'll rephrase.
Or thrown away entirely, along with the rest of the archaic idea of
module registration.
The time has come to recognize that CPAN is an unregulated free-for-all,
and that the existing way of trying to wrap our heads around its
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:03:09PM +, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
I'm sympathetic to the idea, but some of the information in DSLIP is
useful and shouldn't be thrown away (such as how supported,
alpha/beta/mature, and license). What isn't in META.yml should go there.
I'm much less
