Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote:
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky.
Gah. Kill me now, please.
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think Gah. Kill me now,
please. Now they have two problems.
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)-config(name = do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
;$;]-[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;-setup;
pgpPN95226GvT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-03 11:00]: On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote: --- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. Gah. Kill me now, please. Some people, when confronted with a problem, think Gah. Kill me now, please. Now they have two problems. Gratuitous. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
--- Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but for the most part it is a happy little bubble. When I lose that abstraction layer, I guess I'll have to go sell fishing reels, start a night club, join a monastery, or etc. Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I guess we've all lost that abstraction layer ... :) Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote: Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I guess we've all lost that abstraction layer ... :) That's me in the corner. That's me in the spotlight. Losing my abstraction layer. -- Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny? -- Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny? Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/). Their music seems awesome. If I ever get to that part of the world, I might just drop in. (Zawodny works for Yahoo!) Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
Ovid wrote: Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/). Their music seems awesome. If I ever get to that part of the world, I might just drop in. (Zawodny works for Yahoo!) Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. -- Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. Gah. Kill me now, please. -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
Andy == Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andy On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote: Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I guess we've all lost that abstraction layer ... :) Andy That's me in the corner. Andy That's me in the spotlight. Andy Losing my abstraction layer. s/layer//, it scans better. Trying to keep my point of view... And I don't know if I can do it. Oh no, I code too much. Haven't debugged enough. Is that why I heard you laughing? I thought that I heard you ping. I think I thought I saw you reply. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
On 2 May 2007, at 23:40, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Andy That's me in the corner. Andy That's me in the spotlight. Andy Losing my abstraction layer. s/layer//, it scans better. Trying to keep my point of view... And I don't know if I can do it. Oh no, I code too much. Haven't debugged enough. Is that why I heard you laughing? I thought that I heard you ping. I think I thought I saw you reply. Yes, that's much better :) -- Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
* Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 16:10]: A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually Gah. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
On 28/04/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Fergal Daly
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am:
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the
machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird
things to their perl instlls some times),
Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue.
It must be nice to live in a world where all bug reports come from
people with sane configurations :)
F
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans on Saturday 28 April 2007 05:29 am:
/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/
B.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Icheckav_save_ptr at
/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70.
I think the problem is the $ENV{PERL} || 'perl' bit. You want $^X.
I can't see any common differences between the machines it fails on,
and the machines it passes on
If you look again, you might find that they all have something like this
is common:
Perl: $^X = /home/cpan/perl588/bin/perl
I'm guessing that the PERL5LIB in the testing rig combined with your
test script forcing use of the system perl is causing perl5.6 or
whatever to try to load the .so for 5.8.8.
--Eric
--
The first rule about Debian is you don't talk about Debian
---
http://scratchcomputing.com
---
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:40 -0700
Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the problem is the $ENV{PERL} || 'perl' bit. You want $^X.
Aahhh yes, that looks quite likely. That was a line for our custom perl
testing harness at work. I should change that to use $^X, indeed.
--
Paul LeoNerd Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
# from Fergal Daly # on Saturday 28 April 2007 02:16 pm: Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue. It must be nice to live in a world where all bug reports come from people with sane configurations :) Yeah, that's part of the grand delusion which allows me to keep working in the field. I find it is easier to think logically when A ne a, etc. Of course, there's some metaphor shear when my mom calls to ask why her printer driver requires her to install internet explorer, etc, but for the most part it is a happy little bubble. When I lose that abstraction layer, I guess I'll have to go sell fishing reels, start a night club, join a monastery, or etc. --Eric -- To a database person, every nail looks like a thumb. --Jamie Zawinski --- http://scratchcomputing.com ---
Test failures - I can't work out why
I've got a large number of failures (9 fail vs. 6 pass) on one module of mine, which is dragging my stats down quite a bit, and I've no idea why: http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/B-LintSubs.html#B-LintSubs-0.03 They all seem to fail on some variant of: t/01happyCan't load '/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/B.so' for module B: /home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/B.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Icheckav_save_ptr at /home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70. That looks very much like a problem in B.so itself. But my module, B::LintSubs is just a single pure-perl module of that name, I don't go anywhere near B itself, so why does B fail here? I can't see any common differences between the machines it fails on, and the machines it passes on (7, including my desktop at home I tested it on). Does anyone have any ideas? -- Paul LeoNerd Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird things to their perl instlls some times), F On 28/04/07, Paul LeoNerd Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a large number of failures (9 fail vs. 6 pass) on one module of mine, which is dragging my stats down quite a bit, and I've no idea why: http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/B-LintSubs.html#B-LintSubs-0.03 They all seem to fail on some variant of: t/01happyCan't load '/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/B.so' for module B: /home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/B.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Icheckav_save_ptr at /home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70. That looks very much like a problem in B.so itself. But my module, B::LintSubs is just a single pure-perl module of that name, I don't go anywhere near B itself, so why does B fail here? I can't see any common differences between the machines it fails on, and the machines it passes on (7, including my desktop at home I tested it on). Does anyone have any ideas? -- Paul LeoNerd Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
Re: Test failures - I can't work out why
# from Fergal Daly
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am:
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the
machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird
things to their perl instlls some times),
Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue.
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans on Saturday 28 April 2007 05:29 am:
/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/i686-linux-thread-multi-64int-ld/auto/B/
B.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Icheckav_save_ptr at
/home/cpan/perl588/lib/5.8.8/XSLoader.pm line 70.
I think the problem is the $ENV{PERL} || 'perl' bit. You want $^X.
I can't see any common differences between the machines it fails on,
and the machines it passes on
If you look again, you might find that they all have something like this
is common:
Perl: $^X = /home/cpan/perl588/bin/perl
I'm guessing that the PERL5LIB in the testing rig combined with your
test script forcing use of the system perl is causing perl5.6 or
whatever to try to load the .so for 5.8.8.
--Eric
--
The first rule about Debian is you don't talk about Debian
---
http://scratchcomputing.com
---
