On Wednesday 07 Apr 2010 22:40:45 David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 07:39:08AM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I think that there should be a way to indicate that a module is up-for-
adoption using, say, META.yml. One option would be to use one of the
keywords in the keywords key:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 07:39:08 +0300, Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il said:
Ahem. That's easier said than done. I had tried to register a few
namespaces
in the past, but I didn't get any reply (inluding not an acknowledgement)
and
none of my namespaces were registered.
Yes, I know,
# from David Golden
# on Friday 02 April 2010 06:01:
On Mar 31, 2:51 am, tim.bu...@pobox.com (Tim Bunce) wrote:
It would be handy if there was a way for authors to indicate that
new maintainers are sought. Perhaps via the META.yaml/(.json) file.
...
It's not in the CPAN META spec ...
To me,
On 2010-04-03, at 7:03 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from David Golden
# on Friday 02 April 2010 06:01:
On Mar 31, 2:51 am, tim.bu...@pobox.com (Tim Bunce) wrote:
It would be handy if there was a way for authors to indicate that
new maintainers are sought. Perhaps via the META.yaml/(.json)
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 09:01:37 -0400, David Golden xda...@gmail.com said:
To me, PAUSE would seem to be the right place to do it, as it doesn't
require authors to re-release a distribution just to indicate a change
in status. PAUSE permissions need to support open for claiming that
On Mar 31, 2:51 am, tim.bu...@pobox.com (Tim Bunce) wrote:
It would be handy if there was a way for authors to indicate that
new maintainers are sought. Perhaps via the META.yaml/(.json) file.
It would also be handy if that (or another) mechanism would also
indicate orphaned modules -- modules
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jeffrey jeffreykeg...@jeffreykegler.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:51 am, tim.bu...@pobox.com (Tim Bunce) wrote:
It would be handy if there was a way for authors to indicate that
new maintainers are sought. Perhaps via the META.yaml/(.json) file.
It would also be
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:09:53PM +0200, Rene Schickbauer wrote:
brian d foy wrote:
It's time for Spring cleaning again. If you have ancient versions of
modules sitting around in your PAUSE directory, consider letting them
retire to BackPAN (http://backpan.cpan.org). They don't disappear from
brian d foy wrote:
It's time for Spring cleaning again. If you have ancient versions of
modules sitting around in your PAUSE directory, consider letting them
retire to BackPAN (http://backpan.cpan.org). They don't disappear from
the world, but they don't inflate CPAN either. You don't have to do
