Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread William R Ward
One quick comment - why not follow DBI's lead and use ::PurePerl:: instead of ::Perl::? --Bill. -- William R Ward[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wards.net/~bill/ - A foolish consistency is the

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Kevin C. Krinke
UI::Dialog UI::Dialog::GNOME UI::Dialog::KDE UI::Dialog::Console UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::CDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::Whiptail UI::Dialog::Backend::ASCII (future native perl extensions)

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Christopher Hicks
On 3 Jun 2003, Kevin C. Krinke wrote: ...and the beat goes on... Would somebody give Kevin a cookie for his concerted effort to get this audiences' difficult approval? His persistance is admirable IMHO. -- /chris Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is fighting

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Smylers
Kevin C. Krinke writes: UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog ^^^^ Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how the second Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest. Having gone past UI::Dialog::Backend, we know that it is a user-interface thing, related to

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Kevin C. Krinke
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:05, Smylers wrote: Kevin C. Krinke writes: UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog ^^^^ Sorry to bring this up again, Sure you are... :) but I still don't see how the second Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest. Having gone past

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Tim Bunce
All seems fine to me. Tim. On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote: UI::Dialog UI::Dialog::GNOME UI::Dialog::KDE UI::Dialog::Console UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-01 Thread Fergal Daly
Sorry to bring this up again, I should have chased it more the last time but what exactly is UNIXy about about this module? The reason given previously was that all the dialog programs run on UNIX. That seems fairly incidental, it's not like there can't be dialog be programs for windows, Mac,

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-05-30 Thread Smylers
Kevin C. Krinke writes: Ok I've decided on the following name space: Unix::Dialog- meta module Unix::Dialog::ASCII - native mode Unix::Dialog::Dialog- console (preferred) Having Dialog twice doesn't really aid with working out what it is; I don't immediately see what

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-05-30 Thread Kevin C. Krinke
Heh, it seems I've neglected to mention the significance of the Unix::Dialog module. All the rest are the back-ends and lumping them into X, Gnome, and KDE would not maintain the clean separation that I'm now looking for. This example should help to illustrate: EXAMPLE #!/usr/bin/perl use

UDPM name space finalization

2003-05-29 Thread Kevin C. Krinke
Ok I've decided on the following name space: Unix::Dialog- meta module Unix::Dialog::ASCII - native mode Unix::Dialog::Dialog- console (preferred) Unix::Dialog::Whiptail - console Unix::Dialog::Zenity- GNOME (preferred) Unix::Dialog::GDialog - GNOME