One quick comment - why not follow DBI's lead and use ::PurePerl:: instead
of ::Perl::?
--Bill.
--
William R Ward[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-
A foolish consistency is the
UI::Dialog
UI::Dialog::GNOME
UI::Dialog::KDE
UI::Dialog::Console
UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::CDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::Whiptail
UI::Dialog::Backend::ASCII
(future native perl extensions)
On 3 Jun 2003, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
...and the beat goes on...
Would somebody give Kevin a cookie for his concerted effort to get this
audiences' difficult approval? His persistance is admirable IMHO.
--
/chris
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting
Kevin C. Krinke writes:
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
^^^^
Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how the second
Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest.
Having gone past UI::Dialog::Backend, we know that it is a
user-interface thing, related to
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:05, Smylers wrote:
Kevin C. Krinke writes:
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
^^^^
Sorry to bring this up again,
Sure you are... :)
but I still don't see how the second
Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest.
Having gone past
All seems fine to me.
Tim.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
UI::Dialog
UI::Dialog::GNOME
UI::Dialog::KDE
UI::Dialog::Console
UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog
Sorry to bring this up again, I should have chased it more the last time but
what exactly is UNIXy about about this module?
The reason given previously was that all the dialog programs run on UNIX. That
seems fairly incidental, it's not like there can't be dialog be programs for
windows, Mac,
Kevin C. Krinke writes:
Ok I've decided on the following name space:
Unix::Dialog- meta module
Unix::Dialog::ASCII - native mode
Unix::Dialog::Dialog- console (preferred)
Having Dialog twice doesn't really aid with working out what it is; I
don't immediately see what
Heh, it seems I've neglected to mention the significance of the
Unix::Dialog module. All the rest are the back-ends and lumping them
into X, Gnome, and KDE would not maintain the clean separation that I'm
now looking for.
This example should help to illustrate:
EXAMPLE
#!/usr/bin/perl
use
Ok I've decided on the following name space:
Unix::Dialog- meta module
Unix::Dialog::ASCII - native mode
Unix::Dialog::Dialog- console (preferred)
Unix::Dialog::Whiptail - console
Unix::Dialog::Zenity- GNOME (preferred)
Unix::Dialog::GDialog - GNOME
10 matches
Mail list logo