Re: New modules

2003-11-13 Thread darren chamberlain
* Oliver White oliver.white at blibbleblobble.co.uk [2003-11-12 20:22]:
 As a first step, I was considering adding a module to read GSHHS data
 [a binary format for coastline data] and give it a name something like
 Geo::GSHHS.  More info at the site:
 http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/wessel/gshhs/gshhs.html

You could petition the namespace maintainers for a GIS top level,
especially if you forsee producing a number of modules.

 Is this the right place to ask?

Yes.

(darren)

-- 
So far as a man thinks, he is free.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: New modules

2003-11-12 Thread Ed Summers
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:22:01PM +, Oliver White wrote:
 
 As a first step, I was considering adding a module to read GSHHS data [a 
 binary format for coastline data] and give it a name something like 
 Geo::GSHHS.  More info at the site:
 http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/wessel/gshhs/gshhs.html

Sounds like a good idea to me, considering that Geo::ShapeFile is 
already established.

//Ed


Re: New modules

2003-11-12 Thread James E Keenan
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:22:01 +, Oliver White wrote:
 Hiya. I'm about to start work on some GIS programming in Perl, and
 will likely end up with a few modules that might usefully go onto
 CPAN.

 From what I've read on the FAQs though, it seems like a bit of a
 minefield to

 choose a name that someone else doesn't want,

See below.

 and to find out if
 anyone's already working in the same area.  I did some searches on
 the CPAN website for likely modules, while the documentation
 suggests I ask on some mailing lists, which I presume includes this
 one?

Yes, and possibly a post on comp.lang.perl.modules.  But this list is
where the issues will be argued back and forth.


 As a first step, I was considering adding a module to read GSHHS
 data [a binary format for coastline data] and give it a name
 something like Geo::GSHHS.  More info at the site:
 http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/wessel/gshhs/gshhs.html


To help us understand the problem better, could you spell out 'GSHHS'
and 'GIS'?

 Any comments?  Is this the right place to ask?

Yes, this is *definitely* the right place to ask.
 Is there already
 code somewhere that does it?  Would anyone be offended if I wrote
 the module?

No one will take offense if you write the module, but (as you imply
above) our fellow module-authors are picky about the names of new
modules.

One consideration here:  In the last week or so, there has been
discussion on this list re the general appropriateness of the 'Geo'
namespace.  It seems to be doing double-duty for both 'Geometry' and
'Geography' and some are advocating putting geographic modules in the
'Geography' namespace.  I'm not sure where that discussion ended up;
check the archives or Google it.  But you might want to wait for that
discussion to resolve before finalizing your own module's name.

Jim Keenan