[Monetdb-developers] About the use of hg transplant

2010-05-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
For those using hg transplant to backport changes. Using the -m flag of transplant causes a merge commit to occur. This means two heads (could be branches) are merged into one. For some not yet fully understood reason this causes a hg merge to perform a large batch of changes, probably

Re: [Monetdb-developers] About the use of hg transplant

2010-05-09 Thread Stefan Manegold
Fabian, Thanks for the analysis and explanations! One minor(?) point, though: So far (as far as I'm aware), we used assume an implicite order of our branches, e.g,. Feb2010 - Jun2010 - default, and we used hg merge to propagate (many/all) changes from left to right, e.g., from Feb2010 to

Re: [Monetdb-developers] About the use of hg transplant

2010-05-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-05-2010 12:47:19 +0200, Stefan Manegold wrote: Fabian, Thanks for the analysis and explanations! One minor(?) point, though: So far (as far as I'm aware), we used assume an implicite order of our branches, e.g,. Feb2010 - Jun2010 - default, and we used hg merge to propagate