On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Martin Kersten wrote:
Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and
_BATpreload. I really don't like names that differ only by an initial
or final _. I would much rather see more descriptive names.
On 2010-02-15 09:57, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Martin Kersten wrote:
Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and
_BATpreload. I really don't like names that differ only by an initial
or final _. I would much
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:03:18AM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
On 2010-02-15 09:57, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Martin Kersten wrote:
Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and
_BATpreload. I really don't
On 2010-02-15 10:12, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:03:18AM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
On 2010-02-15 09:57, Stefan Manegold wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Martin Kersten wrote:
Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload,
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and
_BATpreload. I really don't like names that differ only by an initial
or final _. I would much rather see more descriptive names.
BATpreload_ is now more an interface to give advice to the underlying
system about how the BAT is going
Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and
_BATpreload. I really don't like names that differ only by an initial
or final _. I would much rather see more descriptive names.
BATpreload_ is now more an interface to give advice to the underlying
