The Rack (and CGI) specs require that '-' be replaced with '_' for
HTTP header names, so Unicorn is doing the correct thing and treating
it as the same header.
but should it aggregate the values?
Even though '_' appears to be allowed in header names by rfc 2616, it's
use is questionable
El Domingo, 10 de Enero de 2010, skaar escribió:
The Rack (and CGI) specs require that '-' be replaced with '_' for
HTTP header names, so Unicorn is doing the correct thing and treating
it as the same header.
but should it aggregate the values?
Hi, review my other response in this
Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
El Domingo, 10 de Enero de 2010, skaar escribió:
The Rack (and CGI) specs require that '-' be replaced with '_' for
HTTP header names, so Unicorn is doing the correct thing and treating
it as the same header.
but should it aggregate the
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Iñaki Baz Castillo i...@aliax.net wrote:
In your case it seems valid for me (just an opinnion) as
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO: http,https could mean that the request has been
sent
using HTTPS and an intermediary proxy has forwarded it using HTTP. Of
