Pierre Baillet o...@fotonauts.com wrote:
Hello Unicorns,
I've manage to create a simple middleware that replaces the soft
timeout feature. You can have a look at it at
http://gist.github.com/431451
Note that some weird Ruby interpreter behavior breaks at least the
first level of the
Hello Unicorns,
I've manage to create a simple middleware that replaces the soft
timeout feature. You can have a look at it at
http://gist.github.com/431451
Note that some weird Ruby interpreter behavior breaks at least the
first level of the generated stacktrace (it indicates the actual
method
for Soft Timeout in Unicorn
From: Pierre Baillet o...@fotonauts.com
To: unic...@bogomips.org
Hi,
Just tried to send that through the ml, but it seems something went wrong...
Cheers,
--
Pierre.
-- Forwarded message --
From: mongrel-unicorn-ow...@rubyforge.org
Date: Thu, Jun 3, 2010
Pierre Baillet wrote:
We use Unicorn at fotopedia since yesterday in production. We switched from
Passenger due to an issue in the way Passenger was handling some error in
our main application. Things run very well on Unicorn.
We have also modified Unicorn to handle a soft timeout for its
Eric,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
This would be doable as middleware, too, and if done carefully, even
safely reusable in multi-threaded web servers. This would be a good
addition to rack-contrib, even. I might consider doing it myself if I
had
Ohai,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Chris Wanstrath ch...@ozmm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Actually, internally, Unicorn only knows about Rack and wraps older
CGI-based Rails using the Unicorn::App::OldRails application (via
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote:
Actually, internally, Unicorn only knows about Rack and wraps older
CGI-based Rails using the Unicorn::App::OldRails application (via
Unicorn::CGIWrapper).
unicorn_rails basically wraps up the following config for you,
