Re: [Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-devel-list] Initial ARM JIT port in svn

2005-08-09 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, I have no interest or plans to do a PocketPC port myself (if I had a pda I'd run a useful operating system on it, like Linux). Sure... Linux runs on every PDA out there That's not quite true - there are some that it refuses to run on due to problems with the interface and pointing

Re: [Mono-dev] DateTime.Parse difference with .NET

2005-08-09 Thread Alfredo Jose Muela Romero
Hello, El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:30:19 +0900 Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hello, [...] In fact using DateTime.Parse() is somewhat stupid ;-) Read here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/05/03/CultureInfo/default .aspx?side=true#a The

Re: [Mono-dev] DateTime.Parse difference with .NET

2005-08-09 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi, Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with the latest svn HEAD (i.e. the bug report is invalid)... Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote: Hello, El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:30:19 +0900 Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hello, [...] In fact using

Re: [Mono-dev] DateTime.Parse difference with .NET

2005-08-09 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi, Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote: El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:01:32 +0900 Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hi, Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with the latest svn HEAD (i.e. the bug report is invalid)... Which bug? Did I talk to any bug? :-S If I did

Re: [Mono-dev] DateTime.Parse difference with .NET

2005-08-09 Thread Alfredo Jose Muela Romero
El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:13:09 +0900 Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hi, Alfredo Jose Muela Romero wrote: El Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:01:32 +0900 Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hi, Now that it turned out that the bug is not reproducible with the latest svn HEAD (i.e.

[Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-09 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 00:14 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: Also, Gonzalo was trying to work on the large file upload setup, which has better solutions (buffering to files, like is done in Whidbey). large file upload? I don't get it. When POSTing anything big to a ASP.NET page or web

RE: [Mono-dev] not implemented destructor in FontNameConverter

2005-08-09 Thread Andrew Skiba
As a temporary solution I committed TARGET_JVM so that this destructor will not be present in our build, but probably it's worth to do same for Mono, too. I wonder, what was the need to throw NotImplementedException in FontNameConverter destructor? What will do GC when destructor fails in

[Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-devel-list] Initial ARM JIT port in svn

2005-08-09 Thread Hugo Ferreira
Mr Paolo, I've demanded anything here?? Your message just showed the kind of person I'm dealing with. No need for comments. We'll continue in private and save the list from this things... Hugo Ferreira On 08/09/05 Paolo Molaro wrote: On 08/09/05 Hugo Ferreira wrote: Sure... Linux runs on

[Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-devel-list] Initial ARM JIT port in svn

2005-08-09 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 08/08/05 Paul F. Johnson wrote: The same goes for a Symbian or RISC OS port. Problem is that for RISC OS, they don't have dynamic linking support as yet (though the RISC OS gcc is getting there). There would also have to be a different layer between SWF and the desktop as it's not

Re: [Mono-dev] not implemented destructor in FontNameConverter

2005-08-09 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I wonder, what was the need to throw NotImplementedException in FontNameConverter destructor? What will do GC when destructor fails in such way? The code is in FontConverter.cs:283 It seems like code that was originally just stubbed out and not completed. Thanks for pointing this out,

Re: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Kornél Pál
System.Runtime.InteropServices._CustomAttributeBuilder is missing form .NET Framework 1.1 RTM but is in SP1 and is included with NET_1_1. This is true for System.Web.HttpResponse.TransmitFile as well and it is included in NET_1_1. I think including serivce pack extensions in Mono is the best

RE: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello Gert, I don't recall if it existed in .NET 1.1, but it does exist in .NET 1.1 SP1. I just installed .NET 1.1 SP1 (after much pain) and wrote a simple program: using System; using System.Reflection.Emit; class X { static void Main () { Type t = typeof

Re: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Michael Hutchinson
Hi! Note that none of the interfaces starting with _ in System.Runtime.InteropServices are present in the RTM version of 1.1 but are in SP1. There may be other differences. So metadata comparsion should be done on SP1 assemblies rather than on RTM. I am very confused. What does `RTM'

Re: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, You couldn't. I managed to find a document confirming that these interfaces were indeed introduced in .NET 1.1 SP1 : http://www.usysware.com/blog/?p=21 Microsoft's own documentation on MSDN2 says that these first appear in NET 2.0, but I think they're just hiding that there isn't

[Mono-dev] [Patch] AssemblyName ctor

2005-08-09 Thread Carlos Alberto Cortez
hey, Currently the AssemblyName (string) ctor is not implemented to receive the long format assembly name (such MyAssembly, Version=1.2,...). The attached patch adds support for it. Some tests are also attached. Carlos. Index: icall.c

[Mono-dev] [Patch] AssemblyName ctor (correction)

2005-08-09 Thread Carlos Alberto Cortez
In the last message some attachments were missing. All of them are now correctly attached. Index: AssemblyName.cs === --- AssemblyName.cs (revisión: 48211) +++ AssemblyName.cs (copia de trabajo) @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ using System.Text;

RE: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Jeroen Frijters
Miguel de Icaza wrote: Type t = typeof (CustomAttributeBuilder); Console.WriteLine (t.BaseType); And it does not display anything. When compiled with csc 8, it does display _CustomAttributeBuilder. Huh? _CustomAttributeBuilder is an interface, so it obviously

RE: [Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

2005-08-09 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Type t = typeof (CustomAttributeBuilder); Console.WriteLine (t.BaseType); And it does not display anything. When compiled with csc 8, it does display _CustomAttributeBuilder. Huh? _CustomAttributeBuilder is an interface, so it obviously won't show