[Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-09 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 00:14 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: Also, Gonzalo was trying to work on the large file upload setup, which has better solutions (buffering to files, like is done in Whidbey). large file upload? I don't get it. When POSTing anything big to a ASP.NET page or web

Re: [Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-08 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 08/06/05 Michal Moskal wrote: I wonder if: a) we can introduce --with-mmap configure switch? b) better yet, make the mmap version go as fast as the brk one? You may ask on the GC mailing list, maybe Hans has an idea of why it would be slower. If you can reproduce the slowdown with a

[Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-06 Thread Michal Moskal
Hello, I noticed slowdown in Nemerle compiler with: 2005-06-20 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.in: enabled the use of mmap/munmap for solaris and linux. It seems to help with memory usage. With this patch the compiler is about 10% slower, but uses around

Re: [Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-06 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 23:26 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: Hello, I noticed slowdown in Nemerle compiler with: 2005-06-20 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.in: enabled the use of mmap/munmap for solaris and linux. It seems to help with memory usage.

Re: [Mono-devel-list] USE_MMAP speed/time tradeoff

2005-08-06 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 00:14 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: On 8/6/05, Ben Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed slowdown in Nemerle compiler with: Any differences in the oprofile output? Can you try on x86? The oprofile as well as --profile=default:stat shows that the difference lies in