On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 23:40 -0500, Jeffrey Knight wrote:
Only Miguel or a Novell official can speak about Mono and patents.
I probably I misinterpreted this: why isn't anyone free to speak about
Mono and patents?
Mono is GPL'd -- why would a Novell official be in a better position
than
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:47 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
I am trying to convert Win32 specific code to Mono to determine free
disk space available on a given drive. There does not appear to be a
nice portable way to do it, and I am not too keen on spawning df to
determine free space. Perhaps
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:56 +0200, BRUNET Pierre-Marie - stagiaire
wrote:
Hi, I'm french student working on Mono for a University project. I
wonder if Mono launchs a thread for each processor if a multithread C#
program running over Mono.
No. Mono will launch a thread for each
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 09:28 +0200, Matthijs ter Woord (meddochat) wrote:
Is this the coding style used in the class libraries? or could this be
changed?
This coding style (having two members that differ only in case) is
somewhat common in the class libraries. The primary difference is that
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 02:48 +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
I wanna try and marshal a char** that is returned in a struct. You can
see the code here:
http://pastebin.com/291223
I've tried using Copy and ReadIntPtr to no avail. I might be doing
something wrong.
I do not believe that
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 22:05 -0400, Justin Berka wrote:
1. Ruby.NET - Just how hard is it to write a compiler. Also, what kind
of existing tools would be used for this, and what would have to be
written from scratch?
In principal, it's not hard to write a compiler. You just need a lexer,
a
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:39 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Am preparing the release notes for a new release of Mono, please
send any important updates that should go into the release notes to me.
Mono.Unix changes
- Breaking Changes:
- Removed types: MapAttribute, IncludeAttribute,
On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 11:22 -0400, Paul Betts wrote:
I've been looking around, and I can't seem to find any application that
acts like VS 2003/SharpDevelop's object browser.
Depending on your definition of acts like, Type Reflector might work:
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 11:18 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
private static ResourceManager GetResourceManager ()
{
if (resources == null)
lock (resourcesLock) {
if (resources == null)
resources = new GetTextResourceManager (typeof (Locale).Assembly.GetName
().Name, typeof
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 12:32 +0400, Vorobiev Maksim wrote:
Good day.
To the discussion of Syscall.syslog. Why System.Diagnostic.EventLog
was not implemented for Unixes on top of syslog?
Because I never got that far, and nobody else felt it was important
enough to provide a patch. :-)
Plus,
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 16:18 +0400, Vorobiev Maksim wrote:
Good day.
But it still has a problem in map.c for function int
Mono_Posix_FromSyslogFacility (int x, int *r).
It checks for constants via -mask: search for first occurrence. The
next code:
if ((x Mono_Posix_SyslogFacility_LOG_USRE)
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 20:22 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
Windows installer for Mono installs MonoPosixHelper-0.dll but it seems not
to be used at all. Furthermore when I compile Mono on Windows I only get
MonoPosixHelper.dll not MonoPosixHelper-0.dll.
Could someone tell me what
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:26 -0400, Jonathan S. Chambers wrote:
Hello All,
I know that mixed mode assemblies are not supported under Mono
(at least in the managed/unmanaged C++ sense). There is an older article
(I've listed the link below) that demonstrates how to call managed
functions
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 22:48 -0400, Jonathan S. Chambers wrote:
Thanks for the answers. I'm just experimenting with methods to call
managed code from unmanaged code without using COM interop, i.e.
something that would work on both .Net and Mono. Any advice would be
appreciated.
Basic
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 12:22 +0200, Cedric Le Dressay wrote:
.Net is an incredible step in the interroperability of languages. Nearly all
software developpements can use garbage collection. Unfortunately, some
others cannot like game developpement. Typically, a game cannot be
reasonnably
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 20:14 -0400, Ben Maurer wrote:
Index: object.c
===
--- object.c(revision 47425)
+++ object.c(working copy)
snip/
-#ifdef HAVE_BOEHM_GC
+#if defined (HAVE_BOEHM_GC) defined (NVER_LEAK_VTABLES)
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 22:26 -0600, Peter Dennis Bartok wrote:
Jonathan, if you read through the DnD OLE code in the MWF win32 driver, you
will see that I'm doing exactly that.
This works because you're invoking a COM method, which has a
well-defined ABI (stdcall calling convention, all
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:09 +0100, Paul wrote:
I've downloading gtk-sharp from /trunk/sources on anon svn. Have I got
it right that if I run the ./bootstrap file (and then make; make
install) it should generate the code which correctly creates
the /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk-sharp.pc file and the
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 13:37 +0400, Vorobiev Maksim wrote:
Today I've upgraded mono version to 1.1.8.3 and found, that it has no
fixes for syslog support. Not in sources, not in binaries. That version
will contain these changes?
Those changes were made to svn-trunk, not the 1.1.8 branch, so
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 00:06 -0700, Andrew Skiba wrote:
I will create a directory under sys.drawing/test for this helper and
will commit the helper as is. It needs few changes, however, to be
usable for Mono. Today it checks TARGET_JVM to decide whether we are
creating reference results on
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:32 -0400, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
For example, it's not clear how to
determine or control which libraries and assemblies are visible, or being
used by the currently running Mono or MCS.
Two flags control that: -r and -pkg.
By default, only mscorlib.dll and
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:27 -0400, Ring, Kevin wrote:
In Microsoft’s implementation of .NET, it is possible to expose a
class written in C# via a COM interface. This makes it possible
(perhaps even easy!) to instantiate C# objects and call methods on
them from, say, a native C++ application.
Current programming practice is that library exports should have a
common prefix, forming a namespace. Common examples abound in GLib
(with a g_ prefix) and GTK+ (with a gtk_ prefix).
libMonoPosixHelper.so in many cases disregards this, with exports like:
create_z_stream
Quick question: does anybody know of a standard Win32, POSIX, or
GLib/GTK/Gnome-related function that uses variable length structures?
I'd like to use one as a canonical example in the Marshaling guide:
http://www.mono-project.com/Interop_with_Native_Libraries
More complete answer
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:50 +0200, Robert Jordan wrote:
Indeed, variable length != variable count.
But the returned structures must be manually marshaled:
http://www.pinvoke.net/default.aspx/winspool.EnumPrinters
They're trying *way* too hard. This should work:
struct
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:03 +0530, Sridhar Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
I am having GetPathName method call in my C# code. I am using the same
source file to compile both on windows and linux. This method calls some
WIN32 APIs within it. This function also has linux specific code. As there
is no
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:17 +0530, Sridhar Kulkarni wrote:
If we have executable hello.exe created from a cs file, then to run the file
we have to say mono hello.exe. I have several exe which needds to be
executed to start my app. Is there a way that the executable runs just by
saying
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 10:30 -0700, Andy Waddell wrote:
The first set of issues I ran into were pieces of the class library
not yet in the Mono base, but in the Beta 2 version of .NET 2.0. In
each case I’ve either worked around it in our code by substituting
from the 1.0 Framework or gone into
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 11:09 -0500, Sunny wrote:
Anyway, the following code compiles OK with mono 1.1.9 on SuSE 9.3,
but it fails to compile under .Net, and according the ECMA C# spec,
possition 8.7.5. (Events), .Net behaviour is the right one, i.e. this
code should fail to compile.
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 01:32 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
Could someone tell me the versions of Windows that are supported by Mono?
NT-based versions, so NT 4.0 (maybe, I'm not entirely sure), Windows
2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003.
Not supported is Windows 95, 98, and ME, since Mono uses
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 14:09 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Is there a reason why all optimizations aren't on by default? I didn't
see anything in the mono man page, but I suspect there has to be some
tradeoff.
There's a time tradeoff -- more optimizations requires more time to JIT
the code, slowing
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 00:16 +0100, Chris Seaton wrote:
Hows marshalling of strings to native functions work in Mono and .NET in
general?
Implementation Defined comes to mind -- things differ between Mono
and .NET.
What does ANSI mean? I thought ANSI was a family of character sets?
On Mono,
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 23:26 +0200, Samuel Abels wrote:
On Do, 2005-09-22 at 18:45 +0200, Robert Jordan wrote:
You're looking for something like that (untested):
[...]
return d.DynamicInvoke (args);
[...]
Thanks, I did not know this method before. I now implemented this using
a
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:37 +1000, Paddy Joy wrote:
Thanks for the background info and help, it all makes a lot more sense now.
I'm using UnixSymbolicLinkInfo now and getting the correct results.
So am I correct in saying that if you have a UnixDirectoryInfo object the
IsSymbolicLink
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:32 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
Building Mono on Windows is much slower than building it on Linux for
example. The problem seems to be that our scripts use a lot of processes.
Processes on Linux are lightweight but are heavyweight on Windows that
results in delays because
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 13:37 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
Creating library file: .libs/libMonoPosixHelper.dll.a
.libs/signal.o: In function `Mono_Posix_Syscall_psignal':
/mono/mono/support/signal.c:47: undefined reference to `_psignal'
I think Mono_Posix_Syscall_psignal is not required on Win32
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:05 -0700, Zymmeral wrote:
When will there be a C++ compiler for Mono?
The Mono team isn't working on a C++ compiler, and likely never will.
So the answer to your question depends on what features you want.
If you want C++/CLI support for pure-IL assemblies, there will
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 21:12 -0400, ted leslie wrote:
mono does threading different depending on whether 2.4.X vs. 2.6.X kernel ??
The handling of threading changed between Linux 2.4 and 2.6 with the
introduction of NPTL -- Native Posix Thread Libraries. 2.6 is far more
compliant with the POSIX
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 08:08 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
It seems that the UTF-8 decoder treats the byte sequence EF BF BF as
invalid. Doesn't this mean that with your changes, it is encoded as
00EF 00BF 00BF on the Mono side?
The UTF-8 decoder doesn't treat EF BF BF as
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 19:25 +0200, Michal Moskal wrote:
On 10/26/05, Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping that this scenario is sufficiently rare that things will Just
Work. If it isn't, I'll have to find a different escape character.
How's U+0001 sound (control character
Miguel noticed yesterday that Mono.Unix currently has over 270
[Obsolete] declarations. Things will be changing soon, so here is the
what, why, and questions about possible future changes (see the end for
questions under consideration -- feedback is appreciated).
Mono.Unix was originally
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 18:54 -0700, Peter Dennis Bartok wrote:
Regarding use of ref/out/neither: I think use of ref or out is
*required*. It seems that (most) cairo calls involving matrices expect a
cairo_matrix_t* argument. As I understand it, this means that these
That is correct, cairo
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 15:49 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
By keeping all of Mono in a single package (runtime, compilers, core
libraries, GUI libraries, web libraries, database libraries and
others) it is making our future maintenance of code more difficult.
...
So am wondering whether
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 12:46 +0200, Christopher Bergström wrote:
Quick questions
1) What are the recommended tools for debugging mod_mono/xsp/mono? If
it's mono debugger or just recompile with --debug options I apologize
for such an obvious question. I especially need to know for a server
with
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 11:21 +0100, Arnhoffer Károly wrote:
Server Error in '/vb' Application
Compilation Error
Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.
snip/
Should ASP.Mono work with VB or not?
Last I
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 12:33 +0530, Raja R Harinath wrote:
But, do you have libfontinfo.so? Note the lack of the major number in
the DllImport line.
Unless you have reason to require the development package associated
with a shared library, it's probably not a good idea to DllImport the
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 14:26 +0100, mirek wrote:
1. it is good to use xml serialization or binary? as i read the
articles, the binary is faster, but maybe not so usefull when need to
change the configuration file by my own.
If it's not performance critical, I would suggest going with the more
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 05:47 -0700, Buderya Roshan wrote:
In Mono 1.1.13 The class Mono.Unix.UnixFile is marked obsolete.
UnixFile doesn't exist in 1.1.13. It was in 1.1.12.
This
class used to provide a static method TryReadLink to get the target of a
symbolic link. Is the class
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:35 -0500, Joshua Tauberer wrote:
Something about mcs not using the GAC to find assemblies, but only
looking at 'installed' packages with .pc files, or in
/usr/lib/mono/1.0/. You could specify the full path, or use -L.
Could we reevaluate exactly why we avoid using
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 17:25 +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 01/11/06 Jonathan Pryor wrote:
The behaviour of TryReadLink and
UnixSymbolicLinkInfo.ContentsPath seems to be the same. Wanted to
counter check if this is indeed the case.
Those aren't direct equivalents
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 16:40 +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 01/11/06 Jonathan Pryor wrote:
// 1.1.12 Code:
string target = UnixFile.TryReadLink (sym-link);
// 1.1.13 Code:
UnixSymbolicLinkInfo symlink = new UnixSymbolicLinkInfo
(sym
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 20:31 +, Andy Norman wrote:
On Thu Jan 5 17:57:26 EST 2006, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Mono has been ported to Intel Mac, in that the JIT will properly execute
under Mac OS X on an Intel box.
As such you could install mono on an x86 mac with little trouble.
Does
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:27 +0300, Sergey Tikhonov wrote:
Well, it it really pity since it seem that even this unsupported
interpretator does a lot of work and give chance other arches
to try Mono. :) Ok, I will see if I could find what the problem is
The problem is that it's impossible
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 22:13 -0500, joel reed wrote:
I'd like to implement System.Diagnostics.TraceSource if no one has already
planned to do so. This is a 2.0 class.
I've only submitted one bug fix previously to the mono project,
so I thought I'd post the patch for TraceEventType, in the
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 22:46 -0500, joel reed wrote:
thanks Jon for the feedback, i've made all suggested changes
and attached a patch below. (i just deleted comments for now
till i figure out monodoc)
That's much better. I look forward to seeing your future TraceSource
patches.
- Jon
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 12:25 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote:
I have some code that can be modified to replace the functions I use, but
before I re-invent the wheel, can anyone point to portable implementations
of Windows PathCanonicalize and PathRelativePathTo? Better yet, does anyone
want to
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 18:15 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I'll write a test. :-)
PathRelativePathTo: this variation on your
PathUtils.RelativePath works for me (minimally tested):
This looks too simple to work, but I'll try it. ;-)
Attached is a better version, complete
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:24 +0100, ZABALA CALVO, IÑAKI wrote:
I am trying to read and write Excel .xls files
I have tried it with COM:
Mono does not currently support COM interop, though Jonathan Chambers is
attempting such functionality...
If you want to write Excel files, you'll either need
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:40 +1300, Thong Nguyen wrote:
I notice that there is already a UnixDriveInfo. I'm implementing a
System.IO.DriveInfo that currently just reflects on UnixDriveInfo.
As a sanity check, you should make sure your DriveInfo members reflect
the final .NET 2.0 DriveInfo
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 14:14 +, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Julien De Groote wrote:
i would like to make a demo package of the software I am developing.
I'd prefer for my Windows users not to do a full Mono install.
I think Windows users would prefer to use .NET - so long as you do not
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 20:51 -0500, Chris Toshok wrote:
This patch looks okay, except for the switch from 'df != ' to
'df.Length != 0'. I'd prefer the former (and in general I'd rather
adapt whatever my thoughts are on the matter to what the original author
wrote.)
`df != ' may make more
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 03:53 -0600, Zac Bowling wrote:
This is a silly question. Does anyone know of a good term or really
good short name that sums up the difference between a compiler that
uses reflection.emit like mcs does and one that uses a traditional
object compile, link, and execute
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, J wrote:
However, going from C++ to C#, I am using C++/CLI.
Another approach would be to port the entire C++ library to C++/CLI
with /clr:safe (i.e. no unmanaged code). The resulting assembly should
run under Mono (and if it doesn't, makes a good test case
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 18:02 +0100, Denis ERCHOFF wrote:
Hi all,
I am controlling some .Net class from C++ application.
I would like to know if from the C++ context i can add a delegate like
to a .Net property.
I want to catch when a property's getter or a property's setter is
called
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 14:01 -0800, Rusmin Susanto wrote:
I followed the instruction above. But I always get this error:
./teste: error while loading shared libraries: libmono.so.0: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Where is your libmono.so.0 located? If it's not in
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:02 +0100, Jakub Cermak wrote:
And a stupid (maybe) question?
What is wapi?
Windows API.
For portability reasons, Mono uses Win32 APIs for I/O and related
operations (semaphores, process creation, etc). You can find the Unix
versions of these Win32 APIs in
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation of Garbage Collection is considerably
better - not speed wise, but reclaiming memory that is no longer in use.
This is because
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:02 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
- More support for dynamic languages. Perhaps there's an unsafe way (read:
you have to know what you are doing) to unload types. Or perhaps a
modified mcs could generate code for dynamic methods. Or something else I
haven't thought
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 22:55 -0800, Jason S wrote:
What I would like to see, is a nice way of interoping from a native C
++ program into Mono.
As you mention, Microsoft's solution is C++/CLI. There isn't likely to
be C++/CLI support for Mono any time soon.
However, Microsoft has another
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 11:35 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm studying Mono. Today I read the code of CreateFile() function, I
found that if the function forget to call g_free() to release the memory
after conversion from utf16 to utf8. Right?
Where are you seeing this? In
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 12:27 +0800, GaoXianchao wrote:
hi all,
I'm wrapping epoll api on linux.
To pass address of managed struct array to unmanaged code, I use
Marshal.UnsafeAddrOfPinnedArrayElement . But the method is unsafe.
Is there a safe way to do what the
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 08:26 -0400, Justin Dearing wrote:
Ok I have a few patches here. The biggest one is for LdapCOnnection. First
of all I updated all the exception xml comments like so:
-exception LdapException Thrown if TLS cannot be started. If a
exception cref=LdapExceptionThrown if
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 17:20 -0700, Rusmin Susanto wrote:
1. Is there any trick in C# similar to Expression Template in C++ to
avoid pairwise evaluation?
No yet. Expression Templates are possible in C++ because templates are
a turing-complete sub-language within C++; C++ templates were never
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 00:59 +0200, Manfred Braun wrote:
I am new on the road to make some things on my Unix box [which is
NetBSD 3.0/i386] and I started using some simple console programs. My
problem is, that the method Console.In.Peek() hungs, if no input
stream is provided and I just execute
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 15:21 +0200, Ympostor wrote:
Why? This question arised when developing *with* Mono, as stated at:
http://www.mono-project.com/Mailing_Lists
Apparently the word with is ambiguous.
mono-devel-list is for developers developing mono itself, as can be seen
from the Examples
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 17:54 -0500, Voigt, Benjamin wrote:
Would someone please be so kind as to run the following unit test on
Mono?
A similar test would likely be this:
using System;
using System.Reflection;
class GetInterfaceMap
{
public
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:19 +0530, Manish Patil wrote:
So I was wondering if Mono could be used to work with MS Office
application on Windows or Mac.
Not yet. (Jonathan Chambers, please correct me if I'm wrong. :-)
Interacting with MS Office on Windows requires COM Interop support,
which is
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 20:23 -0500, Ettore Pelliccioni wrote:
I am developing a C# application in VS .NET 2005, that
uses OPOS hardware (bar readers and receipt
printer/cash drawer).
Actually, this application, dependends on Windows/COM
(.dll) api that manages the OPOS hardware.
COM Based
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:56 +0200, Arnhoffer Károly wrote:
I would like to try UnixDriveInfo but I can not know how to start. As
I can see to construct a UnixDriveInfo object I have to give a mount
point. How can I get the mount point part of a path?
In general, you don't, since a mount point
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 00:42 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Now in .NET 1.1 SP-N I noticed that they introduced some changes.
Some classes now implemented some new interfaces that were not present
in .NET 1.1. My question is: what is the justification to add new
implemented interfaces to
I don't think that design is very good, for a number of reasons:
- Performance will suck (due to reflection)
- It's highly magical (due to reflection)
- Documentation will likely be problematic (due to magic)
A cleaner, faster, and more easily documented version would be this
(untested):
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:47 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
I've just been asked a question whether it would be possible to create a
TCP/IP{ (native .NET binary protocol) connection between an unmanaged server
written in C++ and a managed client.
Your subject says TCP/IP remoting, while the
This message really belongs on mono-list, but I'll answer it here...
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 11:51 +0530, Sunil Venkateswara wrote:
I am exporting a function in fortran...[and] to import the same
fortran code by DLLIMPORT, using the following code ( added a write
call and removed module
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 23:27 +1000, Peter Nunn wrote:
I've just tried to install mono on a mandriva system and so far most of it
seems to be working, but.. I can't get gtk# working.
If I do
mcs SimpleApp.cs -pkg:gtk-sharp
You want -pkg:gtk-sharp-2.0. gtk-sharp is Gtk# 1.0, which is
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any work being done on System.Collections.ObjectModel?
Work _has_ been done, with the following classes already in svn:
System.Collections.ObjectModel.Collection
System.Collections.ObjectModel.KeyedCollection
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 13:03 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Is saving files in utf-8 without BOM possible in general western
editors land? If yes I like the idea. If not then maybe it is not
a good solution for us (yeah, not using non-ASCII letters is the
most pessimistic option).
Emacs
Mono.Fuse is a binding for the FUSE library, permitting user-space
file systems to be written in C#.
Why?
===
I read Robert Love's announcement of beaglefs, a FUSE program that
exposes Beagle searches as a filesystem. My first thought: Why
wasn't that done in C# (considering that the rest of
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:20 +0100, Ben O'Steen wrote:
when i am talking in a browser i am talking about stuff that you can't
handle with asp.net, like a full fledged arcade game (to take it to an
extreme), a video/audio playing client, the power to properly sync video
and audio, integrate
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 23:12 -0700, Valient Gough wrote:
I've responded separately to Jon because I find his comments inflammatory.
The only inflammatory bit was saying that I didn't like the SULF API.
Which is about as inflammatory as saying Java collections suck (no
language integration like
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 18:07 +0200, Paolo Molaro wrote:
The biggest problem with the mono module is that no headers are
installed, making it difficult to make use of libMonoPosixHelper.so.
This is for a good reason. libMonoPosixHelper.so is an internal
implementation detail, it is not a
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 07:27 +0200, pablosantosluac wrote:
So, let's say I want to develop a filesystem to be integrated with our
software: should I use SULF or should I wait for Mono.Fuse?
SULF is dead (if I'm interpreting Valient Gough's comments correctly).
It's been replaced by fusewrapper:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:09 +0100, Paul wrote:
Currently, I have patches for...
boo
ikvm
monodebugger
monodevelop
monodoc
xsp
I've attached them all to this email - they're not huge in themselves,
but they do change where packages go - and go correctly!
Why the use of $libdir
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 06:43 -0400, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 07:27 +0200, pablosantosluac wrote:
So, let's say I want to develop a filesystem to be integrated with our
software: should I use SULF or should I wait for Mono.Fuse?
...
So you basically have four choices:
1
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 17:36 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
4. Wait for Mono.Fuse. (Actually, you'd be waiting for the Mono.Fuse
dependencies within Mono.Posix to be committed, then either use svn-HEAD
or wait for 1.1.18 to use a separate Mono.Fuse tarball. Furthermore, I
have no idea when
Mono.Fuse is a binding for the FUSE library, permitting user-space
file systems to be written in C#.
Why?
===
I read Robert Love's announcement of beaglefs, a FUSE program that
exposes Beagle searches as a filesystem. My first thought: Why
wasn't that done in C# (considering that the rest of
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 11:46 +0300, sasha wrote:
* C# and C knowledge are a must.
Do you use simple C or C++ ?
C. All C code is within a support library invoked by C# through
P/Invoke, and thus needs to export a C ABI. (C++ with ``extern C''
could be used as well, but C is the currently
Mono.Fuse is a C# binding for the FUSE library.
This release features a near complete change in the public FileSystem
API; a complete API change list is available at:
http://www.jprl.com/Blog/archive/development/mono/2006/Sep-11.html
Hopefully this will be the last major API change, though I
On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 21:07 -0700, Valient Gough wrote:
(1) The reason it is harder to use the path-based API for a complex
filesystem has nothing to do with lines of code. The problem is due
to the data model, what I tried to explain before - with the path
based API, libfuse is remapping the
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 21:31 +0200, pablosantosluac wrote:
Hey, next step could be having the same on Windows? Do you imagine it? File
system kernel modules written in C#
You're more than welcome to try. :-)
The problem is that FUSE is a kernal module + library pair. To do the
same on
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 13:32 -0400, Michael Jerris wrote:
* vasprintf: please attach the license that the implementation
in freedts uses, if it is not MIT X11 we can not use it.
The header from the file in freetds (and a few other replacement
functions that may be interesting
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
