Hello,
I suggest we move ahead with the fix.
OK, just committed. I know that time is money :)
I wish DotGNU also decide to move.
Regards,
-- Atsushi Eno
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
For now, lets assume that the bug is in the documentation, so lets move
closer to the .NET behavior, and submit the bug to ECMA/Microsoft so
they can fix their docs.
About this topic, I made contact with DotGNU developers ML.
Gopal V, one of the developer, said that it would be better
Hello,
For now, lets assume that the bug is in the documentation, so lets move
closer to the .NET behavior, and submit the bug to ECMA/Microsoft so
they can fix their docs.
About this topic, I made contact with DotGNU developers ML.
Gopal V, one of the developer, said that it would be
Hello.
Nick, James, thank you.
System.Xml is part of the ECMA standard, yes? In this case shouldn't a
documentation discrepancy indicate Microsoft needing to fix things, as
otherwise they'd be breaking the standard? :)
I looked into ECMA spec and pnetlib (of DotGNU) source,
and found that
Hello,
I looked into ECMA spec and pnetlib (of DotGNU) source,
and found that both of them are based on MS's documentation.
Remember one thing: ECMA documentation is based on the Microsoft
documentation, and sometimes the Microsoft documentation does contain
errors on it or does not match the
