Hello,
The new Socket.XXXAsync APIs were added to the .NET FW to ...provide an
alternative asynchronous pattern that can be used by specialized
high-performance socket applications. This class was specifically designed
for network server applications that require high performance. (MSDN)
I was quite disappointed when I saw the mono implementation of this API -
create a new thread for each XXXAsync call. This cannot produce a good
performance.
Did you test that this implementation is really more performant than the
BeginXX/EndXX async pattern?
Is there any plan to rewrite this code in the future?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SocketAsyncEventArgs-Implementation-tp22081313p22081313.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
