On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:33:56PM -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
Ah. I was under the impression form the OP that it would only work on
the CWD, not the entire checkout.
Naw... the current rule for all monotone commands is that foo
operates on the entire tree, and foo . operates on the current
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:33:22 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
njs Comments would be appreciated. In particular, what do people
njs think of having:
njs * 'revert foo/bar.txt' - works as now
njs * 'revert --all' - works like current 'revert'
njs *
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:24:18AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
'Monotone revert' without arguments reverts the whole directory.
Isn't that dangerous? I like the subversion way that requires an
explict dot: 'subversion revert .'. What do you think?
So, we had a bunch of discussion of this
On 12/13/05, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:24:18AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
'Monotone revert' without arguments reverts the whole directory.
Isn't that dangerous? I like the subversion way that requires an
explict dot: 'subversion revert .'. What
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 20:32 -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
[...]
As was said before, I think that monotone revert . makes sense, .
being the cwd, of course. monotone revert --all seems like an
unneeded option (unless I'm missing that monotone revert reverts the
entire working copy...).
It
On 12/13/05, Timothy Brownawell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 20:32 -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
[...]
As was said before, I think that monotone revert . makes sense, .
being the cwd, of course. monotone revert --all seems like an
unneeded option (unless I'm missing that
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:24:18AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
'Monotone revert' without arguments reverts the whole directory.
and worse, does so silently. It should describe its changes (like
update does).
Isn't that dangerous? I like the subversion way that requires an
