Re: [Monotone-devel] Promoting usher to become a standard utility

2005-10-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:48:22 -0700, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: njs Another option would be to move it out tree entirely, as a njs separate add-on that implements the 'monotone usher interface' or njs something. Doesn't seem like anything that really

Re: [Monotone-devel] Promoting usher to become a standard utility

2005-10-25 Thread Emile Snyder
I vote for in tree, and part of standard releases. Serving multiple distinct projects a'la CVS from the same server comes up repeatedly on the mailing list as something people would like to do. If monotone's answer is to have a separate utility to do it (and I like what I've seen of usher so far

Re: [Monotone-devel] Promoting usher to become a standard utility

2005-10-24 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 00:00 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hi, I've seen enough good things happening with usher that I'd like to promote it to become a standard utility. All that would require would be that it got moved out of the contrib directory, that a test was created

Re: [Monotone-devel] Promoting usher to become a standard utility

2005-10-24 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:08:07AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: ...but then, it's hard to test properly since that would require doing things like reloading the config file and rearranging the servers while there's a number of open connections (in particular, when I first put in config

[Monotone-devel] Promoting usher to become a standard utility

2005-10-23 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I've seen enough good things happening with usher that I'd like to promote it to become a standard utility. All that would require would be that it got moved out of the contrib directory, that a test was created for it and that Makefile.am had the following change: # # old_revision