Hi
I want to generalize a debugging routine.
Instead of writing a horrible hardcoded
43: player:tell(now come to verb `:go_crazy', line 43);
44: player:tell(value at this point: , value);
and the like all the time, I have written a verb
#1:debug(?msg)
--
{?msg = {}} =
Andrew Wendt wrote:
Using callers() won't reveal the line, but callers(1) will, right?
*bonk* *bonk* *bonk* = my head against the wall
*blush*
humbleThanks/humble
- Daniel
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the
Dr Robert Sanderson wrote:
Historically, as I'm sure you're all aware, the only reason for these
forks is that moo-cows and similar contact with the 'main' 'developers'
has been intermittent at best. And when people have tried to make
contact in person, there's been no response.
Me too I had
[Note to enCore list: This is maybe nerd stuff]
[Note to moo-cows: This is maybe just-below-basics]
Lambda MOO 1.8.0r5.
Compiling this:
{1, 2, 3, 4} = args;
{} = args;
1 = 2;
break;
continue;
$;
;
;
;
;
;
returns these errors (from the parser.y file):
