[MOO-Cows] Re: [encore] line number in callers()

[Daniel Jung]

Andrew Wendt wrote:
Using callers() won't reveal the line, but callers(1) will, right?

*bonk* *bonk* *bonk* = my head against the wall
*blush*
humbleThanks/humble
- Daniel
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED].
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send administrative queries to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[MOO-Cows] Re: [encore] line number in callers()

[H. Peter Anvin]

Sean Davis wrote:
Yes. In fact, it surprises me very much that I can load a core on a MSB LP64
machine (UltraSPARC in this case) and have it work just fine. Then again,
UltraSPARC is not nearly as picky as Alpha when it comes to unaligned memory
access.
It's exactly as picky, but your SPARC OS (Solaris?) probably does 
unaligned trap handling in software, whereas your Alpha OS (Tru64?) doesn't.

-hpa
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED].
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send administrative queries to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]