- Original Message
From: Stevan Little stevan.lit...@iinteractive.com
--
Actually, I said no to the idea of:
with 'Role::Serializable' = { includes = [] };
meaning don't compose any methods, but i still want to do this role,
because I
think that it is not very clear and
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Stevan Little
stevan.lit...@iinteractive.com wrote:
I was not talking here about variables (where the 'statically typed'
term could be applied) I was talking about values.
Okay, I am kind of confused then.
If foo is a value whose type is a string, then
I'm trying to write MooseX::Role::Strict and am having problems (not surprising
since this is my first attempt at hacking Moose).
My code is at http://github.com/Ovid/MooseX--Role--Strict/tree/master
I'm trying to provide my own meta class and using the following:
use
- Original Message
From: Chris Prather perig...@gmail.com
Once I put those four lines together, the following test fails:
isa_ok +My::Role::Example-meta, 'MooseX::Meta::Role::Strict';
With the following error message:
not ok 1 - The object isa
- Original Message
From: Chris Prather perig...@gmail.com
Make sure you're on Moose 0.75 and above. Here is the test file for
the new code, it's anemic, but this part of the code wasn't very well
tested before either.
Hi,
I just upgraded my Moose packages and started seeing these warnings, any
clues?
---
Not inlining a constructor for MooseX::Meta::Signature::Named since it
defines its own constructor.
If you are certain you don't need to inline your constructor, specify
inline_constructor = 0 in your
John Napiorkowski wrote:
Just curious, how would you feel about an implimentation of dependent types
where the functional element was predefined and more explicit, such as (syntax
hypothetical and only partly implemented...)
snip
I am fine with one being able to create, change, and delete
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net wrote:
John Napiorkowski wrote:
Just curious, how would you feel about an implimentation of dependent
types where the functional element was predefined and more explicit, such as
(syntax hypothetical and only partly
