Maybe even integrate with the GitHub jobs data in your profile somehow.
— Thomas Aylott - SubtleGradient - MooTools - Sencha (from iPhone 4)
On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Ryan Florence rpflore...@gmail.com wrote:
Jekyll, host on github, add a JSON file with your information, send pull
request
What do you guys (and gals) think of creating a site similar to this…
http://www.senchadevs.com/
The MooTools community has a lot of freelancers, contractors and agencies.
I'd love to see it get easier for people to find MooTools developers.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Sencha —
or another. The Class system in ExtJS is
based on MooTools Class, with some MooTools 2 concepts thrown in.
Feel free to ping me directly for more info.
— Thomas Aylott - SubtleGradient - MooTools - Sencha (from iPhone 4)
On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Lee lee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
the Element module.
The jQuery and MooTools guys have all done a lot of great stuff! Don't feel bad
of you want to use it ;)
It's all just JavaScript.
— Thomas Aylott - SubtleGradient - MooTools - Sencha (from iPhone 4)
Check out Spice for Espresso.app on the Mac for some ideas.
http://onecrayon.com/spice/
Eclipse Orion also looks very interesting.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Trevor Orr fract...@gmail.com wrote:
UltraEdit which includes the ability
with brilliant creators. The hard part is
finding the time for them to enter a contest ;)
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Apr 4, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Matthew Hazlett hazl...@gmail.com wrote:
The task of learning to use a tool like mootools is simply way outside the
comfort
Mostly. But we also fixed the few IE9 issues way back when we released 1.2.5 ;)
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Apr 4, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Eoler dado.manufakt...@gmail.com wrote:
I asssumed worst...
So, you've really built forward-compatible framework? :)
insanely fast yourself.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:13 AM, Peter Hewat peter.he...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these just silly benchmarks that don't mean anything in real life usage
or is there something to worry about?
The latest github master has fixes for this issue.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Eol dado.manufakt...@gmail.com wrote:
We will do a complete Slick.js code review,
patch up this issue
and release a Core 1.3.2 hotfix asap.
This is a very very major regression.
https://github.com/mootools/slick/issues/#issue/31
I am absolutely humiliated that this made it out in an official release.
We need to patch this up and release Core 1.3.2 asap.
On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Fábio M. Costa wrote:
please, if you could fill
This is a bug in the docs.
We should use real JS code in our docs instead of pseudocode like this.
It leads to confusion.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Mar 1, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Matthew Hazlett wrote:
d = new Element('div', { class: 'lame' });
console.log
imho, if you're implementing a standard method, it's appropriate to
throw if you know you are ignoring part of their request.
e.g. if they pass the second argument and you don't use it for
anything, throw an error.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011
Oh yeah, I totally have that on my todo list.
It’s been there since 2007.
It’s actually quite trivial
Ryan Florence wrote:
wish textmate showed the method names in the outline dropdown
This can get pretty slow if lots of stuff is going on.
Instead I would recommend hooking into Request or whatever so that you can
parse only raw HTML that might actually contain behaviors that you need to care
about.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Jan 1, 2011, at 11:37
will be to standardize the syntax, give it a name and a site ala
semver.org.
So any random project in the future can simply claim that they support it with
a little logo or something.
https://gist.github.com/759332
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Dec 30, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Aaron Newton
I made a Slick.js issue for it and added my comments there.
I watch that much more closely than the ML.
https://github.com/mootools/slick/issues/#issue/15
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Slick.js Lead Dev – Cloudera —
On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:55 AM, justind wrote:
The response
that you’ll have to clean up later.
There are other goals too ofcourse.
So… What syntax do you guys like?
If you have other suggestions please fork and add!
https://gist.github.com/759332
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
Simply changing the layout of the app for the iPad to stacked instead of
quadrants would help Aylott.
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Piotr Zalewa zal...@gmail.com wrote:
Not really.
jsFiddle is A tool to create and share web page samples
It is doing it well and it's
Check out Packager and the removables.
There are special comments in the source code around stuff that can be removed.
You can use Packager to create a specific build that strips those blocks out.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:57 AM, doubleTap
I recently re-wrote DOMReady.js and created a good solid test suite
for it.
I will make the time to look into your issue soon and figure out
what's going on.
Sorry you're having issues :[
On Nov 11, 9:54 am, davepilbeam davepilb...@duntmatter.com wrote:
Hi,
Using 1.3, been doing dev and now
You'd be better off making the mootools-runner run under narwhal.
I'd like that to happen anyway.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Olivier El Mekki oelme...@gmail.com wrote:
The sad thing is it uses rhino and its java bridge to generate
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dylan Schiemann dy...@dojotoolkit.org
Date: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Dojo-interest] Fwd: UI Testing Standardization
To: dojo-inter...@mail.dojotoolkit.org
I think it's also worth taking a look at James Coglan's work:
Ahoy all,
I'm Thomas Aylott. Board member of MooTools and UI Developer @ Cloudera,
Inc.
At the recent Dojo Developer Day we had some very productive discussions
about the current state of UI Testing, where we see it going and what we can
do to improve it in a cross-platform way. In this thread I
Ahoy all.
Yeah, that's definitely a bug.
I'll make sure I release a workaround, patch or fix by Monday.
Thanks everyone for getting it into lighthouse and finding the root cause of
the issue.
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Phil Freo p...@philfreo.com wrote:
I've
an email at
tho...@mootools.net I'll try to remember to propose an optional noWrap option
or something so you don't have to hack Class itself ;)
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:46 PM, noiv noi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm building a biosphere simulation with up to three hundred
I have a helper for it in one of my TextMate bundles that swaps back and forth
if you hit it mo than once.
I also prefer using a var over bind.
Bind has it's uses, but I prefer the simpler var self = this when it works.
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:38 AM, Sean McArthur
That's a breaking change from 1.2 to 1.3.
CPojer should have a doc explaining how to workaround it and a compat file for
it too.
CPojer, what's the URL?
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, André Fiedler fiedler.an...@googlemail.com wrote:
k, that´s bad. Used it a lot. ;o
It's REST
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
On Oct 27, 2010, at 2:57 AM, Oskar Krawczyk oskar.krawc...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a Ruby application. I don't know much about Ruby but apparently they
utilize this kind of methods quite often.
___
Oskar Krawczyk
http://nouincolor.com
On Wed
Agreed.
A dedicated Slickjs.com site is in the works.
Just hard to find the time with moving my family 3000 miles and
starting a new job and stuff ;)
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rolf -nl plentyofr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Slick
Awesome.
I'm on it.
I'll try and get a workaround for this issue pushed asap.
Keep track of this issue on lighthouse:
https://mootools.lighthouseapp.com/projects/2706-mootools/tickets/1056-incompatible-with-serverside-jscript
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Sun
Can you gist.github.com an example ASP file that I can run?
I have no idea how to test this stuff currently.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:50 AM, mrntdung ntdu...@gmail.com wrote:
I used version 1.3 as JS framework with ASP classic based JSCRIPT
.
Longterm I plan on collaborating with Dojo and many more to standardize or
conventionalize automated UI testing.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Greg Moeck gmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to write some integration/acceptance tests
I personally take this issue very seriously.
If you could provide a simple ASP file and tell me what to do to
reproduce the error I will do my best to solve this issue for 1.3.1.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:50 AM, mrntdung ntdu...@gmail.com
Vote here
http://github.com/mootools/slick/issues/issue/7
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
2010/10/22 Fábio M. Costa fabio.co...@corp.globo.com:
@Ryan
This pseudo-class would be an awesome addition!
Agreed.
A dedicated Slickjs.com site is in the works.
Just hard to find the time with moving my family 3000 miles and
starting a new job and stuff ;)
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rolf -nl plentyofr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Slick
bullets might help.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:51 PM, batman42ca batman4...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I have the following sample code:
http://jsfiddle.net/yWe2C/3/
I have an outer div, inside that I have an h3 tag and a paragraph tag.
I set up
of found elements you might be able to use
some Element generics on them.
e.g.
Element.set(
Slick.search(iframeDocument, 'div')[0]
,'foo', 'bar'
)
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com (from iPhone 4)
On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:54 PM, goker.cebeci go...@cebeci.name wrote:
in mootolls 1.3
http://jsconflive.com/29252424
The passionate voice of the MooTools team, Thomas Aylott, spends some time with
Chris Rey to chat about MooTools, community, side projects and gangsta ring
tones.
— Thomas Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools – Cloudera —
could still be a very valuable resource.
— Thomas Aylott (from iPad)
Awesome,
Put it up on The Forge?
http://mootools.net/forge/
— Tom Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools —
On Aug 18, 2010, at 2:15 PM, אריה גלזר wrote:
I don't usually post here about my blog entries but I though this is a point
of interest to the usergroup - this is the story of why i ended up
Since there has been no final release of Slick, there have been no final
benchmarks released.
Slick is faster than Sizzle on some common selectors.
Sizzle is faster than Slick overall.
Slick supports more selectors and passes more tests than Sizzle.
The first goal of Slick 1.0 is passing
Yes, actually.
IE8 implements QSA, but its QSA doesn’t support lots of the selectors that are
pretty standard for all JS-based selector engines.
Some things in Slick are actually faster than in QSA alone. e.g. className
selectors in Slick use getElementsByClassName internally which is much
myClass.instances.invoke(‘method’) ?
— Tom Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools —
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:32 AM, reaktivo wrote:
This is nice, do you know if something like the following is possible?
myClass.all.method() //calls method() on each instance
On Jul 31, 2:53 am, Devign
My guess is that they wanted jQuery support for beginners but didn’t want to
make it a jQuery contest to they added Prototype as the token non-jQuery
framework.
I’ve talked to a number of people about it (some who are Microsoft employees).
They couldn’t really share any specifics. But I’m told
http://mootools.net/shell/bxBWw/20/
Reverse combinators FTW!
http://wiki.github.com/mootools/slick/reversed-combinators
— Tom Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools —
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:43 AM, jacob wrote:
generic way to get an li before a ul
relative to a particular child of a particular
WebKit is the absolute most important platform these days.
That includes Safari, Chrome, iPhone, iPad, Android, Samsung, Nokia, webOS and
soon Blackberry.
Internet Explorer 6–8 is the next most important platform since it’s almost
impossible to get paid without supporting them.
Firefox is
Yes of course, but I didn’t want to go into that much detail in that single
post.
I use WebKit nightly as my development browser.
It has the best Web Inspector and tight OS integration (
command-e).
I then test each minor revision across all target browsers (IE6,7,89, Chrome,
Firefox
Oh yeah, it’s all CSS.
It’ll usually only hit you in the JS land (using MooTools) when dealing with
CSS.
— Tom Aylott – SubtleGradient – MooTools —
On Aug 9, 2010, at 6:43 PM, MIhaitza wrote:
Mootools is A GREAT framework (the greatest I might add) , but it's
not all about mootools
Used to use BBEdit until ~2004 (iirc)
before that I use Dreamweaver on the PC (v 2.0 iirc)
Currently I’m using TextMate, Espresso CSSEdit.
Espresso is really nice, but I already have a really refined workflow in
TextMate, so it’s taking me a while to transition to Espresso.
CSSEdit may
Have you tried removing all the MooTools stuff to make sure it’s actually
MooTools that is causing the problem?
Also, if you could create a focused example of the problem on jsfiddle.net it
would make it easier to fix.
— Tom Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Jul 12, 2010,
Very nice!
You might also want to check out
http://github.com/sergeche/tx-content-assist
It’s by the Zen-Coding guy.
— Tom Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Andrea Dessì wrote:
Hi all,
MooContentAssist is my first plugin and it's still
http://developer.appcelerator.com/apidoc/mobile/1.3
http://developer.appcelerator.com/apidoc/mobile/1.3/api.json
This is a good structure.
I already have a Node.js based convertor that turns that style object into
TextMate code completions.
Try removing Prototype from your page any checking again.
AFAIK MooTools and Prototype are simply not compatible.
If that’s impossible, try swapping which library is loaded first.
When Prototype is loaded it upgrades JavaScript to support a mixed selection of
JavaScript 1.9, ES5
Wait, what?
Are you using MooTools 1.2, 1.3 or some ancient cob-webby version from
the days when dinosaurs roamed the earth outside of Florida?
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Srinivasan M srinige...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been debugging
Even if you don’t have time to actually fix a bug, donating your time to help
find the root cause of the bug is a huge help!
And creating a jsfiddle example of the bug can also be a really huge help.
— Tom Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On May 17, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Aaron
it or some environment that claims to support it
already.
But I digress.
Your Promises implementation and API seems very interesting and I’m going to be
looking into this stuff much more very soon.
I’m very glad to see lots of interest in this stuff.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
Howdy.
Currently the subtemplates feature is only available in one branch.
I haven’t been able to test it much or document it properly yet.
The rest of the functionality is very stable.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Feb 7, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Robert wrote
this sort of thing is really needed in MooTools core.
But maybe I'll make it a plugin if anyone likes it.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
, 10:04 am, Thomas Aylott tho...@subtlegradient.com wrote:
http://mootools.net/shell/nrKCz/2/
Was talking to rpflo about this on IRC.
See
#12http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/jquery-1-4-released...
Just thought I'd share my final solution in case anyone thought it'd be neat
.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Jan 24, 2010, at 3:12 AM, אריה גלזר wrote:
http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/01/better-javascript-classes.html
the final implementation is very much like Moo's, but what's interesting is
she is allowing the instanceof operator to keep
;)
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Ren Yushiro wrote:
So... Why doesn't the mootools community create one IDE that helps
showing the world how great mootools' OOP is?
http://bit.ly/8dIrJt
My NEW BuildSugar
provides a bizarrely clean simple syntax sugar
for building HTML
274 bytes!
¡Antipatterns FTW!
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
actually use it.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Pete Duncanson wrote:
Thats quite insane, what where you snorting when you came up with that?
Are you actually going to use it?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Thomas Aylott tho
form.toQueryString() works?
I think in 2.0 there’s both serialize and toQueryString.
toQueryString should call serialize.
Then you’d be able to call serialize yourself and just look at the specific
value you need.
Maybe this could/should be a plugin on the forge?
— Thomas Aylott
So you're using server-side JScript on IIS with asp?
Very cool
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Pete Duncanson
pete.duncan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Excellent stuff! Theres me thinking I was the only one using it
commercially.
Still trying
Check this out, i sure will:
http://github.com/smith/interoperablejscript
CommonJS Modules support for ASP JScript!
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Pete Duncanson
pete.duncan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Anyway, I wondered if a ASP solution
anything else. This function sitting
there is perfectly harmless.
Let me know if this does or doesn't solve your issue.
Thanks.
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:45 PM, codeBender andrew.gree...@gmail.com wrote:
First, let me say thanks to everyone who
`if (elementOrDocument.id)
elementOrDocument.id.stringMethod();` instead of `if (typeof
elementOrDocument.id == string)
elementOrDocument.id.stringMethod();` or something like that.
2) MooTools creates an `id` method on the global document object
instead of on a unique namespace.
— Thomas Aylott
[image: AylottFailClassic.gif]
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Christoph Pojer
christoph.po...@gmail.comwrote:
Dude! http://bit.ly/FailAylott
Apparently some google groups have been hit by a new kind of spam
where the moderators have had their email addresses spoofed so that it
looks like the spam is coming from them.
If anyone notices any spam on the google group whatsoever, please let
the mootools devs know asap.
Sofar I don't
York]
--
— Thomas Aylott
SubtleGradient
MooTools
assume that it
won't and then stop bothering to submit it?
Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient.com
I highly recommend you upgrade to moo 1.2 is you can.
I know that's an obvious thing to say, but I had to say it anyway ;)
you're welcome.
—Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient
On Apr 3, 2009, at 5:55 AM, electronbender wrote:
in this case i'm still using moo 1.1
Make sure you're building the builder object inside your initilize
function so that this is set properly. Also you need to actually run
the function once you get it. So add () to the end after ].
--
Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient (from iPhone)
On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:17 PM, pradador prada
This is probly the best way to go if you're stuck with an oldschool
dreamweaver-esque template. (we've all been there)
Of course you have to name all your images properly to make it work.
Convention over configuration FTW!
--
Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient (from iPhone)
On Mar 13, 2009
and good. It's probly what you'll want most of the
time. This is MooTools version of find some elements, do some stuff.
Is there a better way?
Now that event delegation is available (as a plugin, in core in the
next major release), have you found any better patterns?
—Thomas Aylott
The result of $$() is actually an instance of Elements. If you
implement your method on that it would make more sense and keep from
polluting Array.
I recommend putting it up on gist.github.com. That's where I've been
keeping all my little plugins like this.
—Thomas Aylott
that stuff, just didn't want to complicate the
example.]]
This is obviously not ideal everywhere. I really wouldn't recommend
this pattern as general practice since it combines the class and the
instantiation and therefore isn't nearly as reusable.
On Mar 12, 10:26 am, Thomas Aylott oblivi
.
—Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient
On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:33 PM, afowler wrote:
On Mar 11, 3:38 pm, Sanford Whiteman sa...@cypressintegrated.com
wrote:
I am aware of the CSS :hover pseudo-class, however I am asking about a
JS solution for a few reasons:
find the parent node of my stuff and add
some basic delegation code. If an element that matches the selector
for my widget is clicked, I instantiate a widget for that element at
that time. Since it's only happening once, it happens pretty quick.
On Mar 12, 10:26 am, Thomas Aylott oblivi
Is there any reason why people should not use multiple domready events? EG:
window.addEvent('domready',function(){ new Foo('[foo=bar]'); });
// other code
window.addEvent('domready',function(){ new Bar('#bar'); });
// other code
window.addEvent('domready',function(){ new
I think this is best.
Let's rename URI - URL (or even String.URL ideally) and we can spend
some time doing a proper URI class also.
— Thomas Aylott / SubtleGradient.com
nutron wrote:
[…]
we need to have this URL thing which is a subclass of string, but
maybe a URI class that uses
So, what are the pros/cons of it being a Class or a String subclass?
btw, It it's a String subclass, then it should be String.URI.
Why can't we have both a String.URI Native and a proper URI class?
String.URI could easily just use URI internally.
—Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient
On Mar 10
almost impossible not to.
—Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, jon topcod...@gmail.com wrote:
What is mootools advantage and disadv over Jquery in general?
This is incredibly awesome!
—Thomas Aylott / subtleGradient
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Iván N Paz wrote:
Thanks Ryan,
This is still a work in progress, but at least it has started :-P
BTW, I updated the demo page
http://ivanicus.com/moo/
http://github.com/mootools/mootools-core/wikis/why-no-official-forum
This is the official position. If MooTools position on forums ever
changes (which it won't), we will update that page.
This is the official reply to all forum related questions.
Happy coding!
—Thomas Aylott
If you need safari2 support in 1.2.x right now you might be able to
get away woith using the custom build I attached to this bug ticket:
http://mootools.lighthouseapp.com/projects/2706/tickets/165-safari-2-0-x-support
It'll probly work well enough for now.
87 matches
Mail list logo
