What Khoo brings up here is another kind of
zeitgeist or opposition to zeitgeist (good post Khoo)
dmb, Ian, Krimel, and Marsha (though a recent post of yours
showed thought) I find your naivety a bit well, naive and unthoughtful.
Ian, you only post every once in while with hardly any
SA,
If my post about Krishnamurti didn't ooze skepticism, I don't know
what to say. Or are we back to the Devil Card in the Tarot Deck and
entrapping ourselves.All these patterns are conceptions rather
than experience. They are dissected and isolated from causes and conditions.
Marsha:
If my post about Krishnamurti didn't ooze skepticism, I don't know
what to say.
woods:
Exactly. That's what I thought you posted and I posted back about
this very point.
Marsha:
Or are we back to the Devil Card in the Tarot Deck and
entrapping ourselves.All these patterns are
] opposition of zeitgeist and Shambhala
SA,
If my post about Krishnamurti didn't ooze skepticism, I don't know
what to say. Or are we back to the Devil Card in the Tarot Deck and
entrapping ourselves. All these patterns are conceptions rather
than experience. They are dissected and isolated from
Marsha:
Ahhh, but dmb's is on the road to becoming a proper academic.
woods:
true. He has to start thinking politically. It has to avoid the fringe
issues the moq set out to establish. The whole argument against
the professor in the office by Phadreas/Pirsig. dmb's becoming a
At 02:42 PM 10/16/2008, SA wrote:
Just pointing out the preconceptions people have. dmb goes as
far as to ask me to leave.
Please. dmb needs to leave with a comment like that. dmb needs to
back up, and just
because I bring up an argument against zeitgeist doesn't mean I'm
trying to kill
