Rasheed,
I would disagree with your statement that looking for a way to 'permanently
experience DQ' contradicts the idea of DQ. Perhaps I'm wrong here, I'm
just working this idea, but instinctively I would say that although living
entirely on the edge of DQ would be completely fruitless, the
Jonathan wrote:
Marco, in energetic terms, closed means that their is no input our
output of
energy. There is no reason the system can't go on expanding in space.
What I would like to find out is *why* it is considered that there is no
input of energy; or, to be more precise, why such a
Hi Jonathan,
many thanks for your adjustments on my post. Hope you forgive my naiveness.
You are touching on something that I haven't yet addressed
in a previous post, and now force me to reveal a key
physical point in my proposed essay: Entropy HAS no upper
limit - it just goes on
even if entropy has no upper limit, isn't there a point where it will have
increased sufficiently to have extinguished life, admittedly the universe
will continue on but thats small comfort to a one sun solar system if life
as we know it dies out.Dynamic Quality is evolution and the threat of
Hi Sam and all,
What I love about this forum is that everything gets questioned, and I find
myself repeatedly called upon to reconsider and clarify my position, often
with unexpected rewards.
Jonathan wrote:
Marco, in energetic terms, closed means that their is no input our
output of
Hi Jonathan, Elephant, Roger, Glenn and All:
Jonathan, I reread your essay *The End of Causality* in searching for
an answer to my question how novel qualities arise from the
rearrangement of elements that in themselves lack these qualities. In
doing so I was reminded that your answer is that
ÿþ<