;c.fru...@unict.it >
> Date: 3/12/18 9:51 PM (GMT-10:00)
> To: MORPHMET <morp...@morphometrics.org >
> Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** [MORPHMET] Re: Digitizing landmarks on live larvae
>
> Dear Avi,
>
> I guess it's hard to formulate any rule of thumb.
>
> Some analyse
sage From: Carmelo Fruciano <c.fruci...@unict.it>
Date: 3/12/18 9:51 PM (GMT-10:00) To: MORPHMET <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** [MORPHMET] Re: Digitizing landmarks on live larvae
Dear Avi,
I guess it's hard to formulate any rule of thumb.
Dear Avi,
I guess it's hard to formulate any rule of thumb.
Some analyses might not be defined if the number of variables exceed the
number of observations. Some other analyses might be defined (there is
many distance-based analyses nowadays which circumvent that problem).
However, whether
Hi Carmelo,
Thank you for those answers.
One more question please:
I know that the number of specimens should exceed the number of the total
landmarks (fixed-landmarks + semi-landmarks). Is there a rule of thumb of
by how much or what ratio between specimens to semi-landmarks one should
keep?
Il 6/03/2018 4:44 PM, Avi Koplovich ha scritto:
Hi Carmelo,
Thank you for your answer.
My project tests for the influence of kairomones of a predator fish on
the morphology of Salamander larvae during its development. To do this,
I take pictures every other week of larvae spawned from six
