Certificate Chains, PKCS12 and Mozilla

2003-11-04 Thread user
Hello everybody, I have a problem with certificate chains (I have been exploring through the mailing list archives and i haven't seen it) sorry if it is a repeated topic. I have a PKI with 3 levels: 1. A root self-signed certificate at the first level 2. Sub certification authorities certified by

smart card with private key an C_UnwrapKey / C_Decrypt

2003-11-04 Thread Jan Keller
Hi! To decrypt some ciphertext with the private key from a smart card I need to unwrap the private key first with the following code: rv = C_UnwrapKey(session, wrapMech, unwrappingKey, wrappedKey, wrappedKeyLen, template, 4, unwrappedKey);

UhZ52l britney_spears_still_the_sexiest UhZ52l+P

2003-11-04 Thread whatever
We all know how sexy she can be!! s4W,ob)PKnlw\7ujwwvD\^$kH;[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ mozilla-crypto mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto

NSS ignoring next update on CRL check

2003-11-04 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
I've discovered bug 108021 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108021 and the steps that have been taken so that NSS ignores next update when checking a CRL. I'm surprised the security implication of that were not taken more into account before implementing it. I'm a bit shocked by such

Re: Certificate Chains, PKCS12 and Mozilla

2003-11-04 Thread Julien Pierre
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a PKI with 3 levels: 1. A root self-signed certificate at the first level 2. Sub certification authorities certified by the first one at second level 3. User certificates certified by second level authorities at third level. That is a fairly typical PKI. All

PSM and crl distribution point

2003-11-04 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Is there a way to get PSM to make any use of the crl distribution point (crldp) extension ? How is it handled within NSS ? (I could check the source/doc. I will if nobody feels inclined to respond) ___ mozilla-crypto mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NSS ignoring next update on CRL check

2003-11-04 Thread Julien Pierre
Jean-Marc, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: All in one, I don't think it's a good pratice at all not to include this verification inside the crl check function. There is no client that should have a need to continue to trust an outdated crl. It's standard practice that if the only available crl is

Re: PSM and crl distribution point

2003-11-04 Thread Julien Pierre
Jean-Marc, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: Is there a way to get PSM to make any use of the crl distribution point (crldp) extension ? How is it handled within NSS ? (I could check the source/doc. I will if nobody feels inclined to respond) Or you could type distribution point in bugzilla query