Duane wrote:
The currently level and ease of use of cryptography is
pretty poor, and perhaps that's understating it somewhat...
This is a popular misconception among the cognoscenti,
who feel that everybody should - for instance - always
encrypt all e-mail. As a consequence, we all somehow
Whay don't you use LDAPv3 as protocol? This makes it easy to set up
query limits, slave servers and so on. This could act as a address book
also.
Try www.OpenLDAP.org.
The code in mozilla is mostly there, I belive. Maybe there is some
issues with LDAPv3 och getting the cert.
- Emil Assarsson
Emil Assarsson wrote:
Whay don't you use LDAPv3 as protocol? This makes it easy to set up
query limits, slave servers and so on. This could act as a address book
also.
Try www.OpenLDAP.org.
The code in mozilla is mostly there, I belive. Maybe there is some
issues with LDAPv3 och getting the
Duane,
The idea is good, but as you point out, protocols such as LDAP already
exist to do this.
What's missing is a global (worldwide) directory that's independent of a
particular corporation of government. The key problem is that no one
entity would have the resources to host such a server.
Julien Pierre wrote:
Duane,
The idea is good, but as you point out, protocols such as LDAP already
exist to do this.
What's missing is a global (worldwide) directory that's independent of a
particular corporation of government. The key problem is that no one
entity would have the resources to
I'm currently drawing up a proposal for an independent submission for an
Internet Draft and I'm after feed back on this.
My idea is pretty simple, if all you have is an email address of the
person you want to email, and they have a public certificate listed in
the system, client software