JTK wrote:
Am I wrong in stating the
obvious fact (which I need not remind you even Mr. Hickson agrees with)
that Mozilla is nowhere near release quality? And that development has
been going on for four years?
Yes and yes. Since you love playing semantics, I'll do the same. To be strict,
Sadly, voting is going to get less relevant, rather than more. As we move
towards Mozilla 1.0, there will be fewer cycles for everyone's favourite
unimplemented cool feature as engineers concentrate on less sexy things
like crashers and dataloss bugs.
I'm not sure I completely understand
Rob Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02 Aug 2001:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Magnus Stenman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
To follow up (a bit late maybe) on the why I don't use NN/Moz
thread:
I suspect a lot of people get irritated about the
hysterion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Garth Wallace wrote:
Whichever way I can think of
viewing a *local* mail file in Netscape, Open in Composer won't
produce
the magic of 3). Instead I only get a dialog to navigate my drive, and
OH YEAH!
The Proxomitron (http://spywaresucks.org/prox/), a completely free and
coincidentally the world's best ad/javascript popups/other annoying
crap/etc blocker, appears to not cause Mozilla any problems. Verily, it
smites ass. Go get it, install it, and don't look back, lest you punch
the
