Daf wrote:
Garth Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
9j77tn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9j77tn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Daf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi-
I recently downloaded and installed Mozilla 9.02 to use as a check for
my
Bob Davis wrote:
So is this a bug? It should be if it isn't
bob
It's a known bug, view source downloads a new copy from the server
rather than taking the page from the cache
jukola wrote:
jukola wrote:
Steve Bowen wrote:
I was too fast claiming that there are no problems with images with
0.9.2. Check www.thaiairways.com and Press releases at the bottom of the
page. :-(. Switching back to 4.77 again?
I'm looking, but I don't see exactly what the
Ashant wrote:
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Mozilla Employees | Volunteers
-
Top level developers (?) | 25| 15
Bugs Reported |500| 600
Thomas wrote:
Ok, I now uploaded the report. You can see it at
www.velosschrade.ch/test/report.htm
click on internal links in the TOC. It's a 1.2 MB file, perhaps you
need to download it to your HD to see the full effect. (Mozilla stops
throbbering while loading...)
It took about 15
Mark wrote:
One of the things that plagued me (not a major issue, but a real
annoyance), was that whenever I minimized Mozilla, and tried to restore
a previously minimized app, I had a 4 or 5 second delay. The system
worked well otherwise, and was solid as a rock, but that really annoyed
Christian Mattar wrote:
Hi!
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
snip
Since UDMA does nothing to hurt performance or stability in any way,
there is really no reason to NOT install busmastering drivers that
support it anyhow.
This is not strictly true. There were/are some problems with VIA
chipsets
In Form Manager, under Other saved information - Concatenations, -
Name. The default name is Mr. Kirby the wonder Ursuin. I did not set
this. Everything else is mine, IE zipcode and phone number, but not my
name. I can use the drop down to select Jim, but I'm just curious if
Mr. Kirby the
jukola wrote:
Look here:
You are currently using:
Netscape Communicator 5.0
Unknown language, Windows Win98, Standard Encryption
This is the response when going to the download area of Netscape. I am
though using Mozilla 0.9.2 nightly build 2001071408, at least that is
what I
JTK wrote:
Bill, I kindly ask of you to not pretend to know my motives, 'cause
you're not much of a mindreader.
Sorry Bill, this indeed was one of those times. You made it clear you
didn't know much about the situation, so I figured I'd give you the full
skinny on it. I apologize if I
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Kent Perrier wrote:
You can give Opera the finger and it knows what you mean? :)
Sort of ;-)
Does it also understand that it might have been intended for the
underling
OS and not it?
Yeah, windows sucks. When games go java, I go Unix, probalbly
Peter Lairo wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Mozilla goes through the effort of .slt'ing user profiles, yes?
Do you know how easy it is, though, to just go to %temp% and see
a list of emails you've sent? Why doesn't Mozilla destroy these
copies when it's done with them? Is there
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On 10 Jul 2001 12:11:21 +, George Wright wrote:
That is a terrible idea. I have posted a couple of Qs to this newsgroup
and lurked for a wee while, picking up hints and help along the way. I
have seen the 'debate' about 'JFK' spill over into real anger.
It's
JTK wrote:
Since Peter Lairo has repeatedly sought to silence the free exchange of
ideas in this forum, and wishes me disability so that I am unable to
participate in any such exchange, after much thought and with regret
(since this is a last-resort Final Solution to the Peter Lairo
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Hey jack ass, why do you spell it Maozilla again? have you ever gone
to netscape.public.maozilla.general and wondered why it wasn't there?
He's doing it deliberately. Don't you get it Mao (as in Chairman Mao). He equating
Mozilla with a communist state in
JTK wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Very often backslashes get incorporated
into URLs on many websites, causing links
to work in Internet Explorer, but to fail
in mozilla.
I know that backslashes may not be an
officially accepted standard. But why
not make mozilla automatically convert
backslashes
For the longest time now, the Bookmarks tab in My Sidebar has been
empty... I thought this was a bug still being worked on, but I just
installed the same nightly I'm running on my brother's machine (both Win
2k Pro) and his bookmarks panel works fine... So obviously it isn't
just a bug.
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
For the longest time now, the Bookmarks tab in My Sidebar
has been empty... I thought this was a bug still being
worked on, but I just installed the same nightly I'm
running on my
Jay Garcia wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
For the longest time now, the Bookmarks tab in My Sidebar
has been empty... I thought this was a bug still being
worked on, but I just
Stick with plaintext. Or don't post.
What/who are these many clients.could it be the servers are
filtering out RTF?
Donna
These clients are every client on the planet that doesn't bow down to
what MS calls a web standard. Just cause Outlook Express does it
doesn't mean
Cexy© wrote:
DeMoN_LaG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Stick with plaintext. Or don't post.
What/who are these many clients.could it be the servers
are
filtering out RTF?
Donna
These clients are every client on th
Cexy© wrote:
Well I guess it all boils down to Choices.the world would
be very boring if everybody used the same computer programs.
No. I use Eudora for email because I like it. I like how my mail is
presented to me. Some people use Pegasus, some use Outlook. The idea
Cexy© wrote:
Oh get off the Microsoft Bashing, are you using a MAC/Apple based System?
Do you have Windows,Word, or Office software on your PC, or are you using
Linux?
Uncalled for bashing of a company is wrong. If I were to say Final
Fantasy 8 is too hard, Square soft SUCKS!,
Cevpx wrote:
Attributed Meowbot wrote:
Adam James Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And often enough the poster hasn't written anything that actually
*requires* HTML markup - it's just plain text anyway.
I even see some posters go to great lengths to make their HTML look
like plain
Brian Z Jones wrote:
3. On mailing lists, I usually didn't write the original message, and so
there is no way I can remember what I wrote.
I run my own mailing list for me and my friends. Just a place for
people to spill their thoughts and for us to plan stuff and such. It
gets a
Ere Maijala wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that at least a few of the latest (now using 20010701)
Mozilla builds (running on Windows 2000 Server (SP2)) hang when loading
the following address:
http://www.huuto.net/fi/showlist.php3?tits=saabstatus=Ncat=%lcat=Z
It seems that also Internet
Mark wrote:
These days, with the variety of mail clients and personal tastes, it's
hard to please everyone. However, what I'm attempting to do is
configure Mozilla mail to send an HTML formatted sig with my HTML format
messages. I send messages in both HTML and text (that might be
Steve Carroll wrote:
I'm having problems with jpg files on my web server not being displayed
correctly in Mozilla. If I load any jpg file directly --
http://sciastro.net/test.jpg for example -- only gibberish text is
displayed. If that same file is included in an html file, it displays
JTK wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:06:14 +0100, Gervase Markham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
Actually, I think we have a hack in the cookie code you can turn on which
prevents this... I was in there recently. It's some hidden pref.
Search LXR for
Brian wrote:
Martin Poirier wrote:
yes, use a recent build, that prob is fixed (I'm pretty sure that all
builds newer than june 15 are fixed for this)
Brian wrote:
How can I get Moz to stop importing IE favs?? Can it be done??
Thanks
Thank you, now I have another problem... How do
Carlfish wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:45:32 -0700, Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
We have history, and also 500 other sidebar tabs that IE doesn't offer.
Get your facts straight before you flame, at the very least.
He doesn't need to. When proven wrong, he
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
wise words:
Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
Somehow, I doubt if a person with the
Greg Miller wrote:
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch up to Mozilla?
Forward progress seems
JTK wrote:
OF COURSE IT'S FACT! But this fact doesn't make a very good excuse for why
there isn't an AIM client in Maozilla.
This has absolutely nothing to do with AOL and Mozilla. Other people
have made clients that were AIM compatible. Unfortunately, they were
all blocked. As soon
JTK wrote:
No sir, just wanted to help Mr. Lag et al, who were having some trouble finding
the competition. That's just the kind of reprehensible slimeball I am.
Speaking of which... What is different about the new version?
Still crashes as much
Still really doesn't render
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
Sol Hell wrote:
Depends on your operating system. Usually win98 version is released first.
I'm looking at the Windows Update site and at the IE6 preview site,
neither seem to have anything newer. I do, however, notice that IE6's
minimum install size on Win NT/2k is 75Megs, on 98/SE it's
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
Touche, mon ami. The difference between IE's memory usage and
Mathuzilla's is in fact not ~20MB (that's Maozilla's
JTK wrote:
Just wanted to make sure nobody thought that Netscape is any different
now than it was when Netscape 6.0 was released. From
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,44617,00.html:
Netscape 6 was absolutely the right product at the right time. It
delivered the standards
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
Do
JTK wrote:
Take it anyway you want to Hixie, just as long as you take it with ya
when you leave!*
*That's just a little more humor for ya Hixie, I neither want nor expect
you to leave, nor care whether you do.
Why do you assume that someone named Hickson is southern?
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
Redhat made 3.7m in profits this year, bringing them into the black ink
for the first time. Do you consider them a business now?
JTK wrote:
Comments to Mozilla's 'bloat',
So you are going to tell me Mozilla is *not* a complete pig?
BAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!
But can you get a witness? I said can you get a witness brother!
Ok, let's talk about this one. How many DLLs does IE require? Here
jesus X wrote:
K-M does not use everything in Mozilla except the UI. It's just the renderer in
another app. This does not constitute proof. That's the equivalent of running
Quake 3 on a Pentium with a double speed CD drive, then running it on an Athlon
4 with a 36x drive, and claiming the
JTK wrote:
This better? I have to apologize, I am not nearly nerdly enough to have known
that you needed a space after the two minuses. And I'm using a web-based
newsgroup reader, which Maozilla won't interface to to do such wonderful
things for me.
*gasp* You are going to say that Mozilla
Red Hat makes money off selling Linux CDs and Linux books, as well as
providing tech support. You can go to their web site and download Linux
for free. The only catch is you get no manuals, and they won't provide
tech support. HAHAHA, why am I telling you this? You are the know all
god of
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Really? So I could take Maozilla, bundle it with my own Instant Messaging
utility (supporting both AOL's proprietary IM and non-proprietary,
standards-based ones), rework the email reader to read not only regular pop3
and imap email, but also AOL email, and, oh, say
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], DeMoN_LaG says...
Red Hat makes money off selling Linux CDs and Linux books, as well as
providing tech support. You can go to their web site and download Linux
for free. The only catch is you get no manuals, and they won't provide
tech support
Indeed, which makes it all the more distasteful when those in-the-know
try to misinform people that AOL/Time Warner/Netscape is somehow not in
complete control of this project. Well, as far as the project is under
complete control *COUGH*almostfouryearsnow*HACK*.
If you consider that
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
A Concerned Denizen wrote:
I am using the latest release build of Mozilla 0.91 {2001060703}Win32.
Can I download my Netscape WebMail imap account with Mozilla?
It looks like I have all of my settings correct, but fail to connect
to server.
No. Webmail
JTK wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
jukola wrote:
JTK wrote:
[snip]
Wh... why does *MOZILLA* have a registry key that says *NETSCAPE* not
once, but *twice*?!?!?!? Mozilla and Netscape are completely and
utterly separate entities, the Netscape Maozilla Politburo says so!
What's going on
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
jesus X wrote:
Can you guys take this private!?! You're cluttering valuable Mozilla room.
:)
MarcZilla
Yeah now, come on. All this jibber jabber
Chuck Simmons wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 6:20 PM, Chuck Simmons wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 4:19 PM, Mark wrote:
After calling Netscape Communications on Friday evening when
Netscape's secured news servers (secnews.netscape.com, port 563
Chris Withers wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
BTW, I hope you never used return receipts in NC4x, they're missing from
Moz. It will neither ask for receipts nor return them. They may be
implemented some day.
Cool, now I have an excuse ;-)
I _hate_ return receipts but enver wanted to appear
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Did you even read the article? The talks between AOL and Microsoft have
broken down.
But then the started talking again.
Kast I heard they weren't talking. Maybe AOL will realize
Tim Wunder wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK is a troll that does nothing but complain and bitch, and also on
occasion has a tendancy to bend the truth or flat out lie. He always
complains and says Mozilla sucks and they should just stop working on
it now and give up and let IE win, etc. So
JTK wrote:
Ashant wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:31:48 -0500, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I and everyone else on the planet despise software which requires
rebooting after install. Especially if doing so is only so that said
software can load (or rather, preload) a bunch of crap into
Marc Leger wrote:
Oh, but it is. Thet's common knowledge that when IE crashes it's very easy
for
it to take down the whole OS, necessitating a reboot. There have been
utilities
created by users to help work around that, but it's still a necessary
evil.
That's due to the wonderful
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
However, IE leads the way in bringing my whole
system down in the field of about 6 to 0. Mozilla has never killed my
OS. IE 6 has. IE 5.5 has. IE 5.0 has. I don't consider that
acceptable for my web browser
I don't consider that either a) truthful
Mustafa Hirji wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
Did you even read the article? The talks between AOL and Microsoft have
broken down.
But then the started talking again.
Kast I heard they weren't talking. Maybe AOL will realize they have
enough customer
JTK wrote:
bob wrote:
JTK wrote:
The correct answer is about 3 years and 3 months but there was maybe 6
months background preparation. A bit of a false start and the
concentration of the mail/news team on Communicator 4.5 produced a loss
of 9 months to one year depending on how you look at
JTK wrote:
I and everyone else on the planet despise software which requires
rebooting after install. Especially if doing so is only so that said
software can load (or rather, preload) a bunch of crap into memory
which I don't want there until I need it.
I installed the nightly from last
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
I and everyone else on the planet despise software which requires
rebooting after install. Especially if doing so is only so that said
software can load (or rather, preload) a bunch of crap into memory
which I don't want there until I need it.
I
fire-eyes wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
I and everyone else on the planet despise software which requires
rebooting after install. Especially if doing so is only so that said
software can load (or rather, preload) a bunch of crap into memory
which I don't want there until I need
jesus X wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
You're telling me Microsoft is going from 86% to 20%. That's a decrease of
66%.
Umm, there was a time when Netscape had 90+ percent of the market, and MS was
nowhere to be found. Pinhead.
He's just saying it's impossible for that to reverse. He's like
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], DeMoN_LaG says...
Um, which ones? I've used them all, FINISHED, betas available to the general
public, and betas not available to the general public, on both the Win9x and
WinNT series OSs, and none of them did any hosing of anything.
Have you
Orrin Edenfield wrote:
When AOL ships the next versions of their product, why would they
agree to
use Microsoft IE products as the default product for AOL instead of
imbedding Mozilla? Is it that important to AOL to be on the Windows XP
desktop?
Yes, most of their customers are
jesus X wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
The simple fact is the Win32 platform is lost. Netscape lost to
Internet Explorer back when Netscape was still producing a superior
browser, because Microsoft owned the desktop, and had the resources to
under-sell and out-market Netscape.
I disagree with
JTK wrote:
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Of course, that could easily be corrected by taking a few seconds to
make the browser's built-in downloading more efficient and less
susceptible to crashing. But
Carlfish wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001 20:48:26 -0400, Bill Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
In response to the Win32 platform comments:
How many AOL users are there? Do you know that all AOL users appear as
MSIE users to web servers? So if the current market is 68% 18%
Dave V wrote:
Hi,
I need to access and manipulate an instance of Word from within
client-side Javascript. I can do it easily enough from IE using VBScript,
but my knowledge of Netscape is limited. Is there any way to do this?
VB script is a hack waiting to happen, as you have proven
Alex wrote:
Justin E. Harlow III wrote:
I can't find any info on whether Mozilla 0.9 supports 128 bit
encryption, although I suspect it does not. I went to a site that
wanted this feature, and it directed me to a Netscape download site
that said I was using Netscape 5.0 (is there such
Howard M. Stark wrote:
My system, mozilla 2001051804 win 98, seems to take an awful amount of
time resolving host when I brouse to a new URL. What is it doing? Is it
doing it on my system or the ISP? Can it be made faster. If it is a
Mozilla issue it should be checked into.
Thanks
You mean Doom MXXXIV? No, I grew tired of fighting the exact same Seargents
with the exact same shotgun about thirty-six episodes into that series.
Um, ya see, there are no Seargents in Quake 3. It's an online game.
You kill other people. You need reflexes, skills and thinking to win.
JTK wrote:
So my posting is somehow preventing people from working on Maozilla's biggest
problems, i.e. crazy memory hoggage and slowness?
I'm going to say it again. IE 6 uses over 11,000k to display a blank
page. Keep in mind, large portions of IE are built into the operating
systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently so is insane memory usage, and commie graphics. Unfortunately they
all add up to nobody using Mozilla.
You want insane memory usage? You are one of those people who bitch
that Mozilla opens and takes 20,000k of RAM to display a blank web page
and
78 matches
Mail list logo
