To use Vcards you needed two plugins : about time / aboutpeople to make work.
Those plugins don't work because of the liveconnect issue.
Plus in Communicator most newsgroups and most people receiving emails
asked that they be turned off.
I don't believe that they were put in Mozilla or
The same technique works with Mac as well you go to:
Documents Mozilla folder Profile folder (your name) folder with
random letters and numbers plus .slt News Folder.
Locate NewsFat file. open with BBedite lite. cut and paste line
according to the way you want the news servers to be listed.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/23/2002 5:35 PM, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. apparently wrote exactly
the following:
neign spchen de dutche. grin (I have a friend that has a german -
actually Austrian - wife. I'm unsure of the spelling but the phrase for
Don't speak German is something like
American English, is difficult to learn as well. I know I magle it all
the time.
There are words that are not spelled anything like they are pronounced.
There are words that are spelled the same but depending upon whether it
used a a verb, noun, preposition or the like is pronounced toally
Wouldn't mind seeing such a group and would subscribe to it.
Parish wrote:
OK, fellow Mozillians, what would it take to start a general purpose NG
where nothing (legal) is OT?
There is currently a thread, Warum hat Mozilla 0.9.9 so viele neue
Bugs? Ein Sabotuer running in n.p.m.general
Though we can't vote for this kind of bug I have commented on the bug in
the affirmative!
Sren Kuklau wrote:
On 3/24/2002 6:27 PM, Parish apparently wrote exactly the following:
OK, fellow Mozillians, what would it take to start a general purpose NG
where nothing (legal) is OT?
Parish wrote:
---snip---
Why *American* English? Why not just *English*
--
I would rather gnaw my leg off, pack the bleeding stump with salt,
and run in a circle on broken glass than have to deal with any
Microsoft product on a regular basis.
-- Dan
Ben Bucksch wrote:
Parish wrote:
Why *American* English? Why not just *English*
Because (it seems like that) most American people, unlike Englishmen,
don't care or know how to speak correctly, and what is used is allowed,
so almost anything is allowed. Which American writer can use
Holger MEtzger wrote:
Am 24.03.2002 16:37 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. schrieb:
Your correct!
Like I said I've forgotten the the spelling.
Basically, it was supposed to say I don't speak German, or don't speak
German, or can't speak German something the neighborhood.
Doesn't
Ben Bucksch wrote:
---snip-
In writing, we are even closer to High German. I have no problem
reading even Austrian websites, apart from some strange (for me) words
used. This is very much unlike English, where you have stuff like color
vs. colour, because nobody
Parish wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Parish wrote:
---snip---
Why *American* English? Why not just *English*
British English (or the Kings English) is different. Though we have
Queens, at the moment :-). Now there's a word with a whole different
Parish wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
I watch a cooking progam from Enland on the FoodChannel. The Star is
Jammie Oliver and the show is called The Naked Chef the title is
supposed to mean getting to the bare essentials of food.
He uses a slang tern for great (as in Taste great
Ben Bucksch wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Its not the system is bad. Its just different.
Some things are objectively bad. I don't have no car (for I have no
car) is just logically wrong. And Your out of luck instead of
You're out of luck is, by the definition of the language
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/24/2002 10:23 PM, Martin Fritsche apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Ben Bucksch wrote:
I read somewhere no the web: English (and German) are not
Latin-based; they're Germanic, not Romance.
That's why it's called German and not Roman :-Þ
And especially
actually Austrian - wife. I'm unsure of the spelling but the phrase for
Don't speak German is something like the above.)
If I've mangled the spelling forgive me.
Martin Fritsche wrote:
Johnny wrote:
What language is that?
looks great, i really do want to learn that one.
johnny
Most Plugin folks have gone on to other projects and there is very
little interest in changing.
I have yet to get Quicktime 5.02 on the mac platform to work. Even with
just the quicktime plugin installe along with the Java plugin and the
default plugin.
whereever there is supposed to be a sound
Magnus W wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Strange forum this newsgroup to be dicussing religion.
Not stranger than you advertising your group memberships in every post.
--
Magnus W
Proud AOLTW-Netscape
The code or picture was sent from
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.test.multimedia
Probably why it doesn't work. is that it most likely use layer/layer
tags hwich verbotten in Mozilla/netscape6. IE even though is more
stanadrsds compliant than in the past does allow for backwards
compatible
Wayne Mery wrote:
Matt Williams wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM) wrote:
What's going on? The news server seemed to eat about 4-6
days of posts and then most everyone else has vanished
from the
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
the Palestinians killing Israelies are private
terrorists acting on their own will,
supported and encouraged by the population and the authorities
I disagree with this assessment.
[...]
Arafat is only one person. He
Strange forum this newsgroup to be dicussing religion.
Gervase Markham wrote:
blackbox wrote:
Are you a human ...gerv?
Yes - and a Christian. God is the ultimate hacker - just look at the
code reuse in DNA.
Gerv
--
Peter Lairo wrote:
--snip---
supported and encouraged by the population and the authorities
I disagree with this assessment. Which has got everybody in trouble. Not
once in any news reports have I once heard Arafat or any main stream
Palestinians, say
What i'd like to see on the subject is that in the cookies window of the
preferences. I'd like to view where exactly the company the cookie come
from what its purpose is and date received. That way if i want to delete
one to trouble shoot a problem. Example even in CookieCutter the
information on
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 17 Mar 2002, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. was seen to have posted this
wee note into netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded
as follows:
Sounds that way seems similar to PageMill
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 17 Mar 2002, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T
dman84 wrote:
snip---
receiving a forward without full headers, I like that.. to me I just
scroll over all that anyway and go to the message text.
-Dman84
The reason for the need for the full headers for Fwd's to SpamCop.net is
that use all that information in
On Mac you wouldn't be able to on OS 9,and below because of the problem
with type and creator codes.
if you ateempted to call an html page (URL) then both wold try to open
at the same time. Same problem we have with Netscape6 and Communicator
on the same hard drive or partition. any thing you
Garth Wallace wrote:
snip---
Do any actual professional web designers actually use FrontPage? I
thought it was mostly used by the This is my homepage. Here is a photo
of my cat Poofball. crowd.
The webpages I have might be considered in your latter
Brian Heinrich wrote:
-snip-
From what I can gather, most professional web designers (a) use Macs
and (b) use BBEdit. I'm not a pro by any stretch (just taught myself
[X]HTML a couple months ago) and (a) use a PC (Apple looked like it was
about
wrong when posted.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If most were designed on Mac there would be near as many problems for
mac people to view currently PC oriented pages.
I don't understand what a PC oriented page is. What exactly do you mean?
/Jonas
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If most were designed on Mac there would be near as many problems for
mac people to view currently PC oriented pages.
I don't understand what a PC oriented page is. What exactly do you mean?
/Jonas
A PC oriented page is one
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 17 Mar 2002, Neil M. was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
font size=1 comes to mind. You can see it just fine in windows, but
if you use any other operating system you can't read it.
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 17 Mar 2002, Jonas Jørgensen was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If most were designed on Mac there would be near as many problems for
mac people
Sounds that way seems similar to PageMill
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 17 Mar 2002, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. was seen to have posted this wee
note into netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as
follows:
In fact I'd be hard pressed even to know how to
open it up.
You
He didn't ask that. If was asking about using 4.7.5 he would have been
in another Newsgroup.
The question was answered to use the classic skin. Which comes close to
looking like Communicator.
Lancer Charade wrote:
isu0 wrote:
Is it possible to make Mozilla 0.99 to look like Netscape 4.75?
In Mozilla/ Netscape6 the sumary files are listed as .msf.
In Communicator 4.X.X they are called .snm
DeMoN LaG wrote:
troy hakala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002:
No one else sees this? It's fine in newsgroups, but in all my mail
Besides the are called .msf files now for Moz and N6 instead of .snm
which they had been calle since Communicator 4.0.0 days.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Joyce Severt wrote:
Can someone tell me if there is a way to recapture a message folder if
that folder is gone but I still have the
Neil M. wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If that's the case why can't live connect be used in Mozilla so that
Communicator plugins can be used?
As a matter of fact, I have wondered this as well.
Live connect can't be used with plugins because
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Many plugins That Communicator can use, do not work in netscape 6 or
Mozilla because they use Live Connect.
My understanding as stated on this very newsgroup is That liveconnect
was a proprietary code that netscape used
Garth Wallace wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Many plugins That Communicator can use, do not work in netscape 6 or
Mozilla because they use Live Connect.
This is true. It also is irrelevant to the claim that the W3C banned
LiveConnect.
My understanding as stated
.
Garth Wallace wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
What's happening with plugins now is that they currently use a system
called liveconnect which has more or less banned according to W3C
rules.
Philip, you really should see a psychiatrist about your compulsive
lying. It's
.
That doesn't mean that some one can't use it. For that matter MS could
use it now if they so chose. since they don't usually adhere to standards.
Because liveconnect can not be used, most plugins can not be used.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
That Live connect
Christian Biesinger wrote:
---snip---
Giving you a worthless version of Real Player? That is a big issue
Which version does Netscape come with?
I can answer this: RealPlayer 7/8
RealPlayer is now up to RealPlayerG2 which is equivlent to v10.
Oh, RealG2
Johnny Yen wrote:
---snip-
So what do you think Netscape should do about *potential* customers that
dump Netscape because of the Plugin issue? Just write them off? Now, I
know that N6 is incredibly *green* and N7 will be Killer, but it dang well
better
The only plugins Netscape did originally supply with Communicator 4.X was
LiveAudio (one they designed for sound
Default plugin which basic calls a program that ask you to get required plugin
RealPlayer 8 which is out of date they now gone to ReaplayerG2 which if
it had a version number would be
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
-snip
I found that myself as well, but a) it's about headers, not body text,
and b) it's a dupe of an (unknown) bug which is already fixed... so
that's not it. I refuse to believe that this bug is not in Bugzilla
already, so I won't file it.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Only subjectively can you say the same about
pornography.
/Jonas
There are many people that are addicted to porn as well. And many are
closet pedephiles.
There is a Sheriff's office that has a website and chat line that they
use to find and arrest Pediphiles.
In
Questions regarding Communicator 4.7 should be directed to:
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.machintosh (mac)
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator.windows (windows PC)
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator.unix (Unix)
Randall Sell wrote:
Hello all,
Excuse
Gervase Markham wrote:
Couldn't they use the same servers, just set up a new directory and
offer it as a separate NG? Is it really that hard to do?
Yes, probably. No, not really.
I don't think the obstruction is technical. I'm not actually sure what
it _is_ - presumably lack of time
Yes use Interarchy (Anarchie) FTP Client. I think they have a Windows
version available.
You just go to ftp site drag file to desired location and it starts
downloading. You can inerrupt the download and restart. It will continue
on where it left off.
Chris wrote:
I was hoping somebody can
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Has nothing to do with AOLTW, Netscape, Mozilla, China, Communism.
It was just a joke. We have a person in this newsgroup who likes to talk
about his conspiracy theory of how the communist AOLTW-Netscape wants to
make Mozilla please China. I found your suggestion
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Kryptolus wrote:
You know. He probably believes it's his job as a man to protect the
women of this planet from all the dirt.
Don't forget to keep the women inside the house. You never know what bad
things can happen to them
That's Right! That's the was it was meant.
Glad someone else know what i mean besides me. grin
Parish wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Its one thing to view art, its another to have to deal with pornography.
What we are talking about is out, and out porn
I've harpped on this before and I will now.
If you discontinue the Mail list deal and place Mozilla on a Secure News
server you'd only something like that maybe once every two or three
years instead once every two or three post.
Why is that not possible. is the Secure Server Software that
Well I read the groups every day, and have set to read at least a 100
post every day. In That 100 post lately i can Guarantee seeing atleast
5-10 x-rated post on 2 of 4 the groups I view every day: Doesn't seem to
be as much on the mac group.
Any type of Layer is prosona non grata in Moz and N6. It seems that
According to W3C rules its not legal
so you'll have to use maybe something like Style Sheets to place objects
and have the text Flow around.
one of the web programmeress on the list may come along and give you
proper method.
Kryptolus wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If you discontinue the Mail list deal and place Mozilla on a Secure News
server you'd only something like that maybe once every two or three
years instead once every two or three post.
The spam filter bug
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
If you discontinue the Mail list deal and place Mozilla on a Secure News
server you'd only something like that maybe once every two or three
years instead once every two or three post.
The spam filter bug (http
The information given on various internet news outlets at the time it
happened said it was a 50/50 split.
However; that said anything could have happened after the original sale.
Adam Bailey wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
I
Actaully Netscape is owned by a 50/50 split by Sun and AOL-Time-Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 07:45:30 -0800, Keith Whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THing is, Brian, this news is over 6 months old by now.
I don't know what the update info is...
If it HAD affected
Pratik wrote:
On 2/16/2002 10:07 AM, David Tenser wrote:
snip
This leads to a question I've been wanting to ask for quite some time
now: Is filing a bug report the correct way to suggest improvements?
Of should improvements be filed to another place?
It's the correct way. There's a
Neil M. wrote:
The two programs I use for screen capture the Mac are SnapZ Pro, and
Screen Catcher both can handle png. But Mac people tend to use jpeg/jpg,
and gif. I have PhotoShop Lite Adobe recently named to it to something else.
Why do you need a screen capture program? It's it
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Are you refering the use of Graphics period? Or the use of
Gif?
gif
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
A poet who reads his verse in public may have other nasty
Well then discontinue the mail list gateway.
Should be exclusively newgroups only anyway.
david avery wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Just moving to a secure server would get rid of most it.
Kryptolus wrote:
Robert Davies wrote:
Is no one going to get rid
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Travis Crump wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
up too much bandwidth, and few programs support .PNG.
Isn't that sort of a mute point if you are planing to post
the screen shot to bugzilla where your target audience would
be using
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Hi,
when i need to make a screenshot, I am always unsure as to which
fileformat to save it to (gif, jpeg, png, etc.).
Since screenshots are usually only a few colors (no photos in the
shots), there must be some fileformat that keeps the
Just moving to a secure server would get rid of most it.
Kryptolus wrote:
Robert Davies wrote:
Is no one going to get rid of this guy?
--
Regards, Robert Davies
My ICQ UIN is: 2905399
__
Do you Netscape?! If not, why not?
http://home.netscape.com/
Ian Davey wrote:
JTK wrote:
Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it
required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM.
Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla
If they are no larger than that does sound like server.
Lancer wrote:
May be is because the server, i'll look for new one. The images are
doesnt large than 10k.
Lancer wrote:
hi, i am trying to open this new portal, i d like you to take a look and
let me know what you think
Now that loads fast 2 seconds or less.
Lancer wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/charadew/index.html
Lancer wrote:
hi, i am trying to open this new portal, i d like you to take a look and
let me know what you think
http://www2.netexplora.com/LatinMOZ/
--
Okay. Your Correct.
Magnus W wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your correct about the WWW. But I was commenting the Comment about the
internet hasn't existed that long.
That has not been said in thi
Bundy wrote:
---snip---
I thought Netscape was born from Mosiac, the first internet browser. I
remember when Mosiac was all you had for graphical internet.
--
Kyle
Yes, the Name Mozilla (MO) was taken from Mosiac.
--
Actually the dept of defense created what we know as the internet, in
the 60's.
Up to the advent of 2400baud modems about 90' Mostly the Government and
and College and Universities, used the internet exclusively.
Netscape was started in about 92/93'.
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Bob Lathe wrote:
/Communicator up to and including 4.7.9.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Actually the dept of defense created what we know as the internet, in
the 60's.
Yes, as the ARPAnet. But the topic here is not the Internet nor the
ARPAnet, but the World Wide Web, which
I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items; but page size is not the
browser's part. The browser typically sets: Header and footer items
whether they
and see what is set.
Report back with results.
Parish wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
Communicator/Moz/Netscape 6 add specific items
Flo Ledermann wrote:
cut
(i'm not sure, but i guess netscape 6.x is counted as netscape)
of course these are all people in the academic system, and not
representative for the general public. (although probably the kind of
people most of the readers of
, as there is nothing wrong with my reply.
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Please go to :
news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.macintosh for Mac Communicator
general Questions
news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator for windows
Communicator General Questions
news
The Company is called FullCircle that does Talkback.
Travis Crump wrote:
I reported a bug on this once and was told that talkback is a tool that
isn't being developed by Mozilla so this will never be fixed.
David Gerard wrote:
When talkback.exe is trying to send a talkback, it takes
Please go to :
news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.macintosh for Mac Communicator
general Questions
news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator for windows
Communicator General Questions
news://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator.unix for Unix
Communicator General Questions
Just for people wanting to switch over. what is a W3C sanctioned
replacement that does the same thing as Layer? can you use the same code
just subsitute the new call for the layer tags?
Jason Johnston wrote:
Whoa, whoa! The old Netscape 4.x document.layers DOM is not supported
by Mozilla or
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Jason Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 31 Jan 2002:
Not able to cut it, eh? Take a peek at
http://www.bosrup.com/web/overlib/ No problem whatsoever. Just
uses a newer version of the same script that actually complies
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Jason Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 31 Jan 2002:
Not able to cut it, eh? Take a peek at
http://www.bosrup.com/web/overlib/ No problem whatsoever. Just
uses a newer version of the same script that actually complies
Chuck Simmons wrote:
JTK wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Business 2.0's Erick Shonfeld (better known as Future Boy) has
posted a story nailing AOL Time Warner - the parent company of his
employer - as only keeping Netscape alive so they could file a lawsuit
against Microsoft. Here is
Sören Kuklau wrote:
--snip
I'm pretty sure that trademark is not valid. There is that trademark
with the emoticon (was it ;-)?) which iirc wasn't valid either. And
then there's the Deutsche Telekom (German Telecom, our former
monopolist telecom company) who tried to
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
can't use a green dino. A company that makes a plugin for Communicator
called MacZilla has rights to a Green Dino.
You can't copyright such simple stuff. I can't copyright the letter 'S'
or a pink dog either, hmm?
--
Regards
Actual setting of plugins hasn't been turned on yet. (At least on Mac
Platform, not sure if it has been on PC/Unix either.) (Also not sure if
it will be.)
Henry@VIC wrote:
I have only recently upgraded my NS4.7 to 6.2. While NS4.7 is still
remain installed on my PC, NS6.2 is having some
can't use a green dino. A company that makes a plugin for Communicator
called MacZilla has rights to a Green Dino.
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
From what I have read, mozilla.org owns the trademark on the red dino
head and thats why its not being used as an icon for mozilla.
My question then
Travis Crump wrote:
grayrest wrote:
It probably happened in the installation process, I know that mozilla
doesn't do that when it installs, but anyway. (assuming you're in windows)
Mozilla probably did take it during installation and it should in my
opinion. In my experience, most
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
psmith wrote:
And neither is the History feature which loses its sort
order every time it is closed.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91417, targeted at Mozilla
1.0.1. Whining about bugs in newsgroups doesn't get them fixed earlier.
--
'Open
Sören Kuklau wrote:
-snip-
Apparently, you're missing that Mozilla is not an end-user browser. So
logically, market share of Mozilla itself is nice, but doesn't matter.
What does matter is market share of mozilla-based products like
K-Meleon, Galeon and Netscape.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
How is DSL Broadband setup overseas?
Here (Austria/Europe), you have (for DSL) basically two options: You can
either pay a lower monthly fee and are limited to 1 GB of data transfer,
or you pay more and get an unlimited
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
How is DSL Broadband setup overseas?
Here (Austria/Europe), you have (for DSL) basically two options: You can
either pay a lower monthly fee and are limited to 1 GB of data transfer,
or you pay more and get an unlimited transfer.
Rob Allen wrote:
--snip
I was responding generically to the question about the amount of bytes
used in an email/news message, rather than the specifics of Moz
development. However, even there, I do get bugzilla reports as email
when I connect via my mobile (i.e.
Pratik wrote:
On 01/23/02 10:01 AM, Pratik wrote:
On 01/23/02 09:48 AM, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
---snip-
If you don't use any special formatting, what's the point in using
RTF/HTML rather than plaintext
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
--snip
I can see the usefullness of making text bold or italic. But HTML for
email also allows the sender to specify ugly fonts, sizes, colors,
background colors, margins, images, and a lot of other things which,
when
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
--snip--
With HTML, *you* get to choose which font *I* have to read your messages
in. What if I happen to hate that font?
--
/Jonas
'Open Systems' means no fences. And no fences means no use for Gates.
- Sun Microsystems
WDA wrote:
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Many people prefer not to
I don't know what the big deal about print preview is.
At least on the Mac OS 9 and lower Platform, Print preview is part of
the print Driver (Chooser file).
In any program be it Communicator , Moz, N6, Word, Quicken and so on.
When you decide to print you go to File menu Print.
While in the
daa wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
I don't know what the big deal about print preview is.
At least on the Mac OS 9 and lower Platform, Print preview is part of
the print Driver (Chooser file).
---snip-
phillip
as you have been told before
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that dman84 wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
Bill Lee wrote:
This is an instance where the analytical mind of the
programmers took precedent over the users.
No, once we have titletips,
1 - 100 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
