scrolling sounds good, as long as it's intelligent enough
to interpret a click-release action over a link.
Greg
Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you can
navigate up, down, right, left, etc
Then it should be implemented on windows at least. Mozilla's purpose is
to serve the users' needs right? :)
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On 21 Jun 2001 07:04:19 -0700, Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse
It's being worked on :)
see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775
Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you can
navigate up, down, right, left, etc. I am not talking about
, Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you
can navigate up, down, right, left, etc. I am not talking about
turning the roll button.
This is such a major annoyance, especially if you
Darnit! You beat me to it ;)
Ben Ruppel wrote:
It's being worked on :)
see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775
Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you
can
:
On 21 Jun 2001 07:04:19 -0700, Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you
can navigate up, down, right, left, etc. I am not talking about
turning the roll button.
This is such a major
