On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:23:37 -0500, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
Well, could you then clarify what this place _is_ right for? Is it
maybe for postings *praising* such things as it taking over a year to
get a minimize button on the download dialog?
This is, of course,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 00:08:32 +0200, Henrik Lynggaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
what is this
https://www.mozillazine.org/
guess
It's not weird at all. It's a common hazard of virtual hosting.
When you don't define a virtual host in apache, it tends to just
pick the first
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:27:06 -0300, Edson Alves Pereira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
snip suggestion to replace assert() with exceptions
Firstly, assertions and exceptions have completely different
purposes. Exceptions are for error conditions you _expect_ will occur, and
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 06:15:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
There is no pay (yet) but once we get going income will be generated
through advertisements on the site and various other services which we
will offer, and there will surely be enough to go
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:25:06 -0400, jesus X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
So the MozillaZine server is just redirecting us to that other place?
It's not a redirection - you stay on the same server. The server,
however, hosts multiple sites distinguished only by the domain
company where SVGs are their core business. I have always been
impressed with the Mozilla project and I would love nothing more than to
help contribute to it. My question, is Mozilla still looking for the
necessary pieces to be able to use SVGs? From what I have read around
here, the limited
Carlfish wrote:
It's not a redirection - you stay on the same server. The server,
however, hosts multiple sites distinguished only by the domain name
used to request them. What's happening is you're asking the webserver to
do something it hasn't been configured to cope with, so it's confused
Alex wrote:
That is a completely understandable argument, since I hate it when
programs preload. However, there is noticeable number of people are in
support of it, and I personally would not mind a browser bring preloaded
since I use it so much throughout the day that it would be nice to see
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Aaron Buckner wrote:
I gotta say that's weak as hell.
The Netscape browsers have always required plugins for sound...in fact,
for just about anything besides HTML, GIF, JPEG, and Java. Actually, IE
does too, it just
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK wrote:
The solution is not to use Mozilla, especially the email/newsreader.
The email/newsreader is broken in more ways than one would imagine
possible. Maybe given another three years, it'll be on par with
Communicator 4.7x and IE 5/OE 5. Then again, by
I do not wish to change my present e-mail client (Eudora 5.2), but I do
want to use the
best browser. It appears that Mozilla does not respect the system default
handler for Mailto. OK, I'm speaking Windoze and I don't know what the
equivalent on an X*Nix system would be.
I wish to have
Carlfish wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:23:37 -0500, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
Well, could you then clarify what this place _is_ right for? Is it
maybe for postings *praising* such things as it taking over a year to
get a minimize button on the download dialog?
Hi!
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
JTK wrote:
and attempting to explain why people are reinventing every UI
wheel in sight.
Blame the W3C and CSS 2 :-)
For making the Mozilla project not use Windows' perfectly good tree
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK wrote:
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Gervase Markham say
these wise words:
Mozilla source code was released to the world three years ago today
(according to the dates in the source files.)
so it's taken
Bruce Kagney wrote:
I have a quick question for the community. I'm a contractor with a
company where SVGs are their core business. I have always been
impressed with the Mozilla project and I would love nothing more than to
help contribute to it. My question, is Mozilla still looking
jesus X wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Mozilla already works better than MSIE on my machine. And I prefer
Mozilla's mail/news interface to Outlook...and the fact that I don't
have to load individual messages in order to mark them read (when you're
trying to avoid porn spam at work, the
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
JTK wrote:
and attempting to explain why people are reinventing every UI
wheel in sight.
Blame the W3C and CSS 2 :-)
For making the Mozilla project not use Windows' perfectly good tree
"Justin H." wrote:
JTK wrote:
[snip]
No, the fact that we're not just targeting Windows forced us to do that.
Can't use Windows tree control on Mac, or UNIX, or BeOS, or Amiga, or...
Ok, so why didn't this force you to not use Windows' file open/save
common dialog as well?
JTK wrote:
Well, that only brings up two more questions:
1. Why does Mozilla not need such control over the open/save dialog?
Why is this not skinnable like literally everything else is? Doesn't
that violate the whole design concept of "skinnability"?
Skinnability was not the "design
Quote bars slightly screwed up:
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:51:15 -0400
To: David Hallowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "David A. Cobb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using a different mail client
Bcc: \Public\_M_\[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Monday 03:34 PM 4/16/01, you wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
I do
JTK wrote:
snip
letter "X" makes *everything* sound cool!)
Well I can't argue with that. Sure seems to be getting that new Mac OS
way more attention than it deserves.
MacOS X may have an "X" in it, but it is pronounced "ten."
--
Orrin Edenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.orrinrule.com
Stuart Ballard wrote:
JTK wrote:
Well, that only brings up two more questions:
1. Why does Mozilla not need such control over the open/save dialog?
Why is this not skinnable like literally everything else is? Doesn't
that violate the whole design concept of "skinnability"?
Bruce Kagney wrote:
So before I try to get anyone at work fired up, I want to make sure
that this need hasn't already been met, i.e. next release or near
future. If it hasn't, do you have any idea who I could talk to to get
us started and aligned with current Mozilla/SVG efforts?
you
JLP wrote:
Mark wrote:
This occurs running:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.8.1+)
Gecko/20010415
Using WIN2K Professional (no SP)
When attempting to submit login info via http://www.mypoints.com
I've experienced form submission problems (just not working) in the
Scott Tran wrote:
Deleting Everything in the Mozilla directory and installing again works
for me
I'm about to install the most recent nightly, so I'll give it a shot - thanks.
--
-= Mark =-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm doing all this to try to work around bug
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75607 "Can't create
factories for several components in embedding case". Please see the bug
for background.
It turns out that Factory creation somehow gets messed up when I link my
app with -lwidget_gtk on
26 matches
Mail list logo
