JTK wrote:
So what's the ETA on getting the netscape. out of the names of these
groups, seeing as everyone keeps telling me that Netscape and Mozilla
are entirely unrelated?
Whoever said they're TOTALLY unrelated is a pinhead, much like yourself.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of
Hi!
It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port.
Christian
JTK wrote:
But... then why did NETSCAPE 6.01, which as I keep getting told is
TOTALLY UNRELATED TO MOZILLA, leave behind something with MOZ in the
name?!?!??! That seems contrary to reason, doesn't it?
Excuse me? Netscape 6.01 is based on the same Mozilla branch as Mozilla
0.6 - Netscape
Well, here I am again, with another suggestion I have:
This time is related mail responsing, again inside a mailing list.
Suppose that I want to answer a mail that I've received from a mailing
list. How can I do it if I just want to answer to the mailing list?, not
to the person that has
jesus X wrote
JTK wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
HTH, HAND, *plonk*
Anyway, didn't you *plonk* me already Charlie?
When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been
plonked yet.
This particular troll has changed his (faked) e-mail address more than
once, presumably _because_ he
Hi,
Fulvio Perini schrieb:
Henno Buschmann wrote:
i just downloaded Mozilla 0.91 on my Workstation, which has no direct
Internetconnection. The Computer connects through a Proxy on my Server
to the internet. For HTTP it works fine. But not for Mail and
Newsgroups.
I configured the
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:19:17 +0100, Gavin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
I *plonked* with as much prejudice as this crappy MS news client would
allow me, but I suspect that many others just blocked the moving
target.
When someone finds me a GUI client that does even half
And it came to pass that Alex Usero wrote:
Well, here I am again, with another suggestion I have:
This time is related mail responsing, again inside a mailing
list. Suppose that I want to answer a mail that I've
received from a mailing list. How can I do it if I just want
to answer to the
Andrew Bevitt wrote:
Im new to mozilla, and im entirely confused to why it wont wrok properly.
I am running mozilla 0.9.1 on debian (woody), now
I installed the program to /usr/local/mozilla and then made a symlink to
my java runtimes
ln -s /usr/local/java/jre
time! The mail and LDAP is now really usable. However, under WinNT it
migrates my Netscape Navigator profile over to Mozilla, but puts it under my
WinNT profile on my hard drive (i.e. C:\WINNT\PROFILES\username\APPLICATION
DATA\MOZILLA). It cannot be put there, because we use NT roaming
Christian Mattar wrote:
Hi!
It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port.
Christian
And not only that, we're still in the Browser business .. fancy that !!
:o)
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI
UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Post To Group ONLY, No Email
Hi!
Jay Garcia wrote:
Christian Mattar wrote:
Hi!
It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port.
Christian
And not only that, we're still in the Browser business .. fancy that !!
:o)
It gets better and better - Imagine: Netscape is != Mozilla, although
they
On pdabuzz the forums are rendered very weird with the latest nightly.
See http://www2.pdabuzz.com/Forums/showthread.php?s=threadid=18715
Don't know if this is a bug in the design though.
--
- Torgeir
WOW We have a genious in our midst! Anyone that can understand Unix
and Windows. Plus experince the joy of using Mac as well. Must be up
there with Einstein!!
What little I have fiddled with it (helping a Windows friend trouble
shoot a problem. I do like the looks of 98 better than 95.
Asa
Jay Garcia wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 6:20 PM, Chuck Simmons wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 4:19 PM, Mark wrote:
After calling Netscape Communications on Friday evening when
Netscape's
There is a note on bugzilla saying:
Bugzilla will be unavailable on Tuesday, June 12 for up to two hours
starting at 6pm for a system upgrade
But there's no mention of what timezone this 6pm refers to.
I'm assuming that this is in Pacific Time, but since Mozilla has
contributors from all over
Good morning.
On a short vacation to Costa Rica,
I found someone who I thought only
existed in my imagination. I now
permanently reside in Costa Rica.
The attraction that exists between
Ticas (Costa Rican girls) and
Gringos (this is a friendly term here)
is mutual. There is an abundance
of
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
WOW We have a genious in our midst! Anyone that can understand Unix
and Windows. Plus experince the joy of using Mac as well. Must be up
there with Einstein!!
The only part I'm missing is the joy of the MacOS part. I can use it, and can
understand some
Yes I save copies of all correspondence on newsgroups and email That I have.
I have an electronics newsgroup (that's sent in email format). I save
everyone of those messages and then compress them in groups of two
hundred in .sit format. Then when i get a group of 10 or more of the sit
files I
jesus X wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
WOW We have a genious in our midst! Anyone that can understand Unix
and Windows. Plus experince the joy of using Mac as well. Must be up
there with Einstein!!
The only part I'm missing is the joy of the MacOS part. I can use it,
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 6:20 PM, Chuck Simmons wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/10/01 4:19 PM, Mark wrote:
After calling
Christian Mattar wrote:
Hi!
Jay Garcia wrote:
Christian Mattar wrote:
Hi!
It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port.
Christian
And not only that, we're still in the Browser business .. fancy that !!
:o)
It gets better and better - Imagine:
Stuart Ballard wrote:
There is a note on bugzilla saying:
Bugzilla will be unavailable on Tuesday, June 12 for up to two hours
starting at 6pm for a system upgrade
But there's no mention of what timezone this 6pm refers to.
I'm assuming that this is in Pacific Time, but since Mozilla
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
HTH, HAND, *plonk*
Anyway, didn't you *plonk* me already Charlie?
When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been plonked yet.
Well you'd think that, but many people seem to have a habit of saying
they've *plonk*ed me, and yet
Gavin Long wrote:
jesus X wrote
JTK wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
HTH, HAND, *plonk*
Anyway, didn't you *plonk* me already Charlie?
When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been
plonked yet.
This particular troll has changed his (faked) e-mail address more than
Carlfish wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:19:17 +0100, Gavin Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
I *plonked* with as much prejudice as this crappy MS news client would
allow me, but I suspect that many others just blocked the moving
target.
When someone finds me a GUI
How pathetic. Get a life, Junior. It is evident you have nothing
productive to contribute to the discussion, and have not for some
time. Yeah, I'm plonking you too now, as you're dreadfully boring.
(Yes, I use Agent for news, and Pegasus for mail. I use Mozilla only
for browsing, because I
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
jesus X wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
WOW We have a genious in our midst! Anyone that can understand Unix
and Windows. Plus experince the joy of using Mac as well. Must be up
there with Einstein!!
The only part I'm missing is
by the Cache directory. Take a look at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78480
GTG
Tom wrote
We have a network folder where these things need to go... So, what does
one do to MOVE the Mozilla profile folder over to another drive and still
retain all your settings? Or is
JTK wrote:
snip
NOBODY uses Win9x because they like it! They use it only because they
have no other realistic option, and nobody seems to be willing to give
them one.
I'm nobody. I like Windows 98 more than NT, 2K or XP. I have them all
running, along with Mac OS 8.5, 9.1 and X, and
as far as I know, there would be a loader.exe to preload mozilla on
windows startup. This would increase startup-time dramatically.
Is this only distributed in Mozilla 0.9.1 because I only dowloaden
Nigthly's (latest is 2001060704) and I cana't find it.
Can't find anything else on the release
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been plonked yet.
Well you'd think that, but many people seem to have a habit of saying
they've *plonk*ed me, and yet still somehow manage to read and respond
to my posts.
Like I said:
When people reply to
Jeroen Roeterd wrote:
as far as I know, there would be a loader.exe to preload mozilla on
windows startup. This would increase startup-time dramatically.
Is this only distributed in Mozilla 0.9.1 because I only dowloaden
Nigthly's (latest is 2001060704) and I cana't find it.
Can't
On 12 Jun 2001, Carlfish wrote:
(And if you haven't then sat through the story of how they rescued the
whole system without requiring a restore, through the use of only
emacs, a pocket-knife and a roll of duct-tape, then you're a luckier
man than I)
only emacs ?!
--
Ian
powerballz wrote:
Is there any way to fake your browser version like you can in Opera? The
problem with doing this though is that webmasters will be getting skewed
demographics and continue to force non-standard MS-HTML on us. But on
the other hand, if the company is deliberately denying
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
That's one of the things I've liked the Mac system up until OS-X is
that you can't wipe out all the contents of the hard drive you are
working on by accident. It has to be a deliberate act.
Same in OS X. there's not way to do it by accident, unless you're a
Henrik Lynggaard wrote:
So you need to sniff to allow for the bug ridden today, and the pleasent
future since the customer wont pay you a second time 1/2 year after to
recode the thing for ns 6.5.
If they want to pay me for the extra work of coding poorly, fine. Otherwise I
code it so that it
Sören Kress wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded my mozilla to 0.9.1 (running on linux). Now I have problems
on some pages with cookies. Specifically I have problems with a simple
JSP page that displays all HTTP header fields. After reloading this page
I used to see a cookie. This is not the case with
38 matches
Mail list logo
