This is my mail filter.
You are receiving this because your mail has come from a
suspicious site. This may be a site that offers free e-mail
accounts, or has poor, or unenforced acceptable use policies
in place. This may also be because your mail had headers
that taged it as probable spam. The result is that this
filter intercepted and deleted your mail.
If you actually are a bulk mailer, an advertiser, or are
makeing a "free offer" (public, private, political,
commercial, or otherwise) please remove this address from
your mailing list, and take a long walk off a short peer.
If you are not one of the above, or you have no idea what I
am talking about, you can get passed the filter. Please
resend your mail with the pass word "nospam" in the SUBJECT
line of your mail. Do this only if you have legitimate
buisness with me.
If you are a spammer and have made it this far through this
message and are too stupid to figure out that I am not
interested, GO AWAY!!. Anyone spamming me in this fasion
will be dealt with harshly.
--------------------------------------------------------------
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 14:34:51 2000
Received: from enigma.qualcomm.com (enigma.qualcomm.com [129.46.2.228]) by
swiftly.qualcomm.com (8.8.5/1.4/8.7.2/1.15) with ESMTP id OAA17870 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:34:50 -0700 (MST)
Received: from qualcomm.com (qualcomm.com [192.35.156.11]) by enigma.qualcomm.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3/1.1) with ESMTP id NAA12391 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000
13:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geek.rcc.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.15.234.212]) by
qualcomm.com with
ESMTP id NAA25484 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 13:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by geek.rcc.se (8.8.4/8.7.3) id XAA31323 for
mp3encoder-list; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:04:00 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: geek.rcc.se: majordom set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from mail.intekom.com (smtp.intekom.com [196.25.69.22]) by geek.rcc.se
(8.8.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA31320 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000
23:03:57 +0100
Received: from rsb53-01-p200.gt.saix.net ([155.239.84.200] helo=Ivanova)
by mail.intekom.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #6)
id 12CUGC-00077n-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:09:24 +0200
Message-ID: <001301bf65e6$a33360c0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Francois du Toit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] More comments from a recording engineer:
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:12:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Procmail: : .procmailrc.except,v $ : 1.9 $
X-Procmail: : .procmailrc.nospam,v $ : 1.10 $
X-Procmail: : .procmailrc.blocked,v $ : 1.5 $
What does the -X n option do?
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 7:25 AM
Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] More comments from a recording engineer:
>
> Here are some more interesing comments from Timothy:
>
>
> ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> From: "Timothy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: LAME
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:49:53 -0800
>
> Mark,
>
> I was playing around with the -X n in the command line for LAME 3.60 and I
> found -X 3 delivers a much better overall sound that is stunningly decent
in
> VBR mode. It actually made joint stereo sound good for once with few if
any
> artifacts and an airy top end that wasn't grainy with a 165 kb/sec
average.
> Here is the command line I used for it: -V 6 -b 128 -B 224 -m j -h -X 3
>
> I used Alanis Morissette's MTV Unplugged CD, track 10 King of Pain. Very
> nice overall sound at an extremely reasonable bit rate. I feel most users
> would like the result and not really pick up artifacts with most material.
> The default setting produced artifacts in the high frequecies with a faint
> shaker and chimes in the backround. But the -X 3 setting does it
> beautifully all the way down to a 165 kb/sec average. I could not get the
> default setting to encode certain backround sounds without artifacts
> regardless of how high the average bitrate was. But the -X 3 option
cleaned
> up alot of upper midrange and high frequency garbage. Sounds nice and
airy
> in the demanding live acoustic music I chose to test it with.
>
> There was little if any descernable difference between VBR 6 at 165 kb/sec
> and VBR 5 at 180 kb/sec which was surprising to me. I'm still putting
3.60
> through the paces. I'll try out more difficult sounds because I am very
> impressed this time and intrigued with the -X 3 setting. It may just seem
> to be doing a good job with this one piece of music. We will see how it
> stands up to real torture. :)
>
> Later,
> Timothy
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>
>
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
