ABR is more like CBR without to be constraint to fit into a fixed bitrate,
so it is allowed to use frames of variable sizes, like VBR too.
ABR is a hybrid of CBR and VBR.
What options give better quality results :
--abr 192 or -b 192 (for example) ?
[or .. what is currently better : ABR
Hello L.A.M.E. people,
1 - Why ABR is much faster than VBR ?
2 - Anyone tested ABR x CBR quality ?
3 - I encoded a file with --abr 192 -js -h (lame 3.84 a1_2j from Dmitry)
and the file have 183 kbps :
32 - 28 - 0.2%
64 - 1 - 0.0%
96 - 1 - 0.0%
112 - 9 - 0.1%
|128 - 250 -
How do you count frames of each bitrate ?
I want to do some stats myself (with diferentes settings and lame versions)
:o)
the stats about this:
3.80
32 - 0 - 0,0%
||| 128 - 17066 - 54,1%
160 -
According to my ISO doc (section 2.4.2.3), for layer III, decoders are not
required to support higher free format higher than 320kbps. So free format
is not restricted to =320kbps.
And decoders must support free format at least up to 320k.
My ISO 13818-3 documentation : Section 2.4.2.3
"The
Are you using the 2.50e version ??
Try new versions of winamp,
In vbr 0 , I found frames from 112 kbps (initial value) to 320 kbps
Ross Levis wrote:
Hi all. I'm new to the list. I have been using Xing's VBR up to now but I am
hoping to find Lame produces better VBR quality - but
Hi all,
where I can find a program for windows 9x that compares mp3, wma, vqf,
etc with the wav ?
I've done some tests with wma x mp3 in diferent freqüêncies but I need
some kind of analizer that could help.
Leonardo Stern
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
It would be nice if such a program existed. If it really could tell
which format sounded the best, it would in effect contain a perfect
psycho-acoustic model. In reality, there is no perfect psy-model,
so if you find such a test program, it will only tell you which codec is
using a
Me Why using lame 3.34 with vbr 0 I have 153 KBPS file while using the
old 3.30 in CDex I have a 124 KBPS file (same track from CD) ? I did
something wrong ?
FP No I noticed the same thing. Please notice, that you used a better
quality-setting (-v -V0) instead of -v -V4. If you have variable
--- Hello and Questions ---
Hello all,
I'm new in list and my linux is not here cos MP3 took all free space and
linux ... I burned some cd's (more than 1000 tracks encoded with LAME
!!!) and soon linux come back
How do I compile LAME under windows 9x (if possible, under Borland C++)
I also
