There is a Word document floating around, published by
Fraunhofer, called "MPEG Layer3 Bitstream syntax and decoding"
It is much more usefull to decoder writers than the ISO docs.
Anybody have a copy of this? I'd love to see it.
Thanks,
Alex
I'd also like a copy of a good version
) 279 898
FAX: +61 (889) 273 889
AudioPhilez (http://www.audiophilez.com)
- Original Message -
From: "Gabriel Bouvigne" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite
detailed - sorry
: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] Decoder quality comparison [quite detailed -
sorry if repeat]
...
My first discovery was that out of the four WAV files I had,
three were
almost exactly identical. The decoded audio from aE4 and the
Fraunhofer
Howdy All,
I recently finished completely overhauling the ISO 'dist10' LSF decoder to
extract a layer-III only player for work. In the process, I discovered a
few bugs/inconsistencies in/between the 'dist10' distribution and ISO/IEC
11172-3 and 13818-3. I don't know if they would
Hi peeps,
I know this is MP3-encoder but I couldn't find any place more suitable to
post the results of some decoder testing I've been doing over the last
couple of days.
I took a fairly complex track (Pat Metheny's Imaginary Day title track in
fact) ripped from CD at 44.1khz 16bit stereo, and
Hi Matthew. Interesting analysis. Just one question.
What do you mean by
WinAmp's EQ sucks bigtime. They all have the same frequency response.
Ross.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
