MP3 uses 576 and 192. When 576 is too low for tonal music and 192 too
long for
percussions, then this is right. But a 1:8 ratio can create other
problems.
Note that MD uses 128, 256, 512 and 1024 sample blocks.
Useful are block sizes from 1 ms ... 35 ms.
Minidisc also uses mixed windows.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:57:39AM +0200, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
I've got another question about window sizes: are the short ones really
essential in VBR? Would it be possible to only use long ones, and then
allocating a lot more bits in the case of transcients? After all, Xing uses
only
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:57:39AM +0200, Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
Minidisc also uses mixed windows. Perhaps mixed windows would help in our
case.
I've got another question about window sizes: are the short ones really
essential in VBR? Would it be possible to only use long ones, and then
Hi Gaby
Why can we read in the litterature that humans got 25 CB but mp3 uses only
22?
let us try to get it in order:
bark scale is used by the spreading function
Bark 0 : 0-100 Hz, Bark 24: 15.5 - 20.4 kHz
masking is calculated for convolution bands
Hello Frank,
Sunday, September 24, 2000, 7:43:06 PM, you wrote:
FK How to capture Win95 Screen Shots? What utility would be the best?
press 'print screen' button (copy)
and paste into paintbrush...
8)
Best regards,
Dmitrymail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why can we read in the litterature that humans got 25 CB but mp3 uses
only
22?
let us try to get it in order:
bark scale is used by the spreading function
Bark 0 : 0-100 Hz, Bark 24: 15.5 - 20.4 kHz
masking is calculated for convolution bands
Lame uses 64 equidistant convolution
"Gabriel Bouvigne" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a scalefactor for 16kHz in AAC? (Meno, are you listening?)
AAC has scalefactorbands that fill the whole frequency range, scalefactors
are calculated for all scalefactorbands.
Bye, Menno
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
Gabriel Bouvigne schrieb am Son, 24 Sep 2000:
So the highest subbands don't have any scalefactor? I know that Brandebourg
said that there is no proof that 16kHz really contribute to the hearing of
the music, and then it could be intentionnal, but could it be a "bug" or
mistake in the mp3
::
:: So the highest subbands don't have any scalefactor? I know that
:: Brandebourg said that there is no proof that 16kHz really contribute to
:: the hearing of the music, and then it could be intentionnal, but could
:: it be a "bug" or mistake in the mp3 specs?
::
40 Hz...16 kHz
Hi Gaby
Why can we read in the litterature that humans got 25 CB but mp3 uses only
22?
let us try to get it in order:
bark scale is used by the spreading function
Bark 0 : 0-100 Hz, Bark 24: 15.5 - 20.4 kHz
masking is calculated for convolution bands
10 matches
Mail list logo
