On 14-Sep-2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know a good technic/routine to time-stretch a buffer of audio
data
Also on this note:
I want to replay audio of talking, but I want it sped up without too much of a
change in pitch. I'm sure someone must have worked through this problem
Yes, Roel was abit rash, but more than just a little justified imho. Don't
deny that quite a few of you were overpraising Vorbis long before it
actually
was much to praise .. sure, it's a format with much potential, but it
hasn't
reached much of that potential yet, and stating that it's an
I've just been trying to help someone with re-encoding from 160/128 down
to
96 kbps for his portable player so I offered -mj -b 96 --mp3input. This
works fine but took longer than expected (perhaps because Lame seems to
automatically resample down to 32 kHz ?), - are these the best options
I could not find the --voice page. is there a specific URL ?, - or which
section is it in ?
http://www.multimania.com/bouvigne/lame/voice.html
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
M Anyway, he apologized, I apologize, we were on the bad crack today. We
can
M finish this up over some beer or good single malt.
I feel this 'urge' to let everyone on this list know that I think beer
is a poor man's drink. ;))
Be carefull Roel, free beer doesn't mean free speech...
(I'm
To answer my own post,
I grabbed Sprenger's smsPitchScale.cp from http://www.dspdimension.com/
and wrapped a bit of support code around it. This program will change the
pitch of an audio file - this means you can play it back so that talking is
twice as fast but *at the same pitch* i.e.
Hi all!
I just made a new TAKEHIRO_IEEE754_HACK more ANSI C compliant.
I think we can make it default for Intel architecture.
does anyone has opinion ?
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Howdy Mike,
Wow, great pointer. The DSP Dimension page had one of the most concise and
yet clear discussions of pitch scaling I've seen. (And it's nice to know
that I didn't need to hedge so much in my original response - my memory was
pretty much spot on...) I'm going to have to read through
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arne Zellentin wrote:
I think it's not the estimated time of arrival, but the remaining
time until arrival. RTUA?
Actually I think it's Estimated time _to_ arrival. Ofs and tos are quite
often left out of acronyms. I'm not sure but I think I've also seen ETA with
the
Francois du Toit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Most of you probably know this, but for those who don't:
BI = 2== Billion:10^12 (10^6*2)
TRI = 3 == Trillion: 10^18 (10^6*3)
In the US,
MONO = 1 == Million = 10^6 (10^3 * 10^(3*1))
BI = 2 == Billion = 10^9 (10^3 *
10 matches
Mail list logo
