Just thought it might be kinda interesting ... any
comments ???
I think it's the player's bug...
- Zia
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Hello,
I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather
bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good with the Windows Media
Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp
anyway: are there some particular
I've got some points on this issue.
1. ISO docs has a number of errors and typos, this can be one of them.
May be authors wanted to set buffer restriction to maximum, but
forgot that maximum frame size corresponds to maximal bitrate
and MINIMAL samplerate and took both maxima for
Hello,
I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame (3.70), and I
find it rather bad. The mp3 files are not faulty, since they sound good
with the Windows Media Player. But Windows Media Player doesn't have
playlists, so I'd like to use WinAmp anyway: are there some particular
Hi, Pierre:
PH I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files
PH encoded by lame (3.70), and I find it rather
PH bad ... are there some particular settings
PH that could improve the decoding ?
The easiest and fastest thing to try, IMHO, is to
use in_mp3.dll from 2.22 version of WinAMP, which
is based
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dmitry Boldyrev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 28. April 2000 11:44
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] winamp quality
Hello,
I use WinAmp (2.62) to play my mp3 files encoded by lame
(3.70), and I
find it rather
Dmitry Boldyrev wrote:
what's wrong w/ winamp's mp3 decoding? i think it is pretty much compliant
with FhG spec.
Some problems like 'stop go' : some very short interruptions during play (even when
winamp is the only running application)
Pierre
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
"E. Zann" wrote:
The easiest and fastest thing to try, IMHO, is to
use in_mp3.dll from 2.22 version of WinAMP, which
is based on Fraunhofer's decoding engine. One can
download it from Dmitry Kutsanov's site:
http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/in_mp3.zip
Personally, I like it better then
sometimes ago i took a look to the world of AAC, and it seemed quite interesting.
unfortunately the free decoder(s?) that were available were also very buggy.
do u know if now there's around somethin good that can be compared to mp3??
Cavallo de Cavallis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've found Winamp sounds pretty bad if you enable MMX decoding.
I suggest just sticking with Pentium/Pentium2 decode doesn't seem to affect
cpu utilisation.
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre Hugonnet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 9:31 AM
The trouble with AAC is that Fraunhofer Dolby are working with RIAA, and
as a result even the distribution of AAC encoders is forbidden. AAC is
intended to be used by music companies and artists to sell their music
on-line, it is also used in hardware for satellite transmission, I think
that
hi
the new lame betas write a version string
into the .mp3-file ("LAME3.80 (alpha 1)").
dunno why, but is there a switch to disable
that?thank you
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Hi all,
The patch included in this mail speeds up old filter_subband(), and It
seems that same speed-up can be applied to current window_subband(). I
tried to understand how current window_subband() works, but I couldn't.
Someone, please explain it.
Naoki
*** filterbank.c~ Mon
13 matches
Mail list logo
