Alberto Garca wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Frank Klemm wrote:
:: MMX:remove the two '#' in the Makefile
::Wow, I didn't know this feature. I've just tested it but it
:: doesn't seem to improve performance :-?
Performance improvement seems to be about 45...50% using "-V0".
Hello Iwasa!
Iwasa Kazmi schrieb am Die, 25 Jul 2000:
This matter has already been told to Takehiro, and he said
he will commit a new code later.
This is an information.
Add debug code into encodeSideInfo2() in bitstream.c as
follows.
+ DEBUGF("%d %d\n",
Yes the output it identical.
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "David Balazic" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] How to enable support for MMX/3D-Now/ISSE ?
Alberto Garca wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Frank Klemm
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, David Balazic wrote:
In my K6-2 300 MHz the difference is 31.695 seconds without MMX
vs. 30.176 seconds with MMX enconding a little wav (using -V0)
Are the outputs identical ?
Yes, it seems to be.
WinAMP produces different output , with each code :
Would anyone care to suggest an online archive to which I can upload my LAME
ActiveX control?
- Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Hi, all
I fixed this bug and committed to the CVS.
pls check out.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // may the source be with you!
This matter has already been told to Takehiro, and he said
he will commit a new code later.
This is an information.
:
Under some conditions, you will see some
