Pierre Hugonnet wrote:
Hello,
not purely mp3, but...
I want to buy a soundcard, and am hesitating between the SoundBlaster 128 (~25$) and
the SounBlaster 1024 Live (~60$).
Main Usage:
- playing my mp3 collection (mainly 128kbs quality) on my (very standard) HiFi
equipement
-
I know there is a project to avoid pauses between tracks by extending the
MP3 format with additional tags. But I don't understand why this is necessary and
AFAIS the handling is a little bit difficult.
Proposal:
Input/Output file name pairs. A missing output file name is substituted by
the
From: Frank Klemm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I know there is a project to avoid pauses between tracks by
extending the
MP3 format with additional tags. But I don't understand why
this is necessary and
AFAIS the handling is a little bit difficult.
[snip suggested support for multiple
::
:: I know there is a project to avoid pauses between tracks by
:: extending the
:: MP3 format with additional tags. But I don't understand why
:: this is necessary and
:: AFAIS the handling is a little bit difficult.
::
:: [snip suggested support for multiple filenames]
::
Robert Hegemann wrote:
You wrote you used the fft_FPU_FXCH code, that is a gogo routine.
I only used it for some speed tests. I took it for an assembler version
of code in fft.c, but you mean it compromizes quality to gain speed?
So you usually have 30 bytes different by the short test?
Hm,
Zia Mazhar wrote:
Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the codec of
Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will give you
better quality and I think it is easier to use.
Am I the only one to really dislike that kind of "skinned" user
da original message
Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the
codec of
Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will
give you
better quality and I think it is easier to use.
Am I the only one to really dislike that kind of "skinned" user
Zia Mazhar wrote:
Real has released a Jukebox that encodes to MP3, too. But it uses the
codec of
Xing and it is costlier than MMBJ. So, you better go for MMJB5. It will
give you
better quality and I think it is easier to use.
MMJB5 uses 'simplified' version of FIIS, it also sounds nice.
It would be easier/better to add multiple file support to LAME. It has been
previously mentioned that BladeEnc has this solved the gap problem with an
option to internally join all selected WAVs for the encoding process.
Ross.
Mathew Hendry wrote:
From: Frank Klemm [mailto:[EMAIL
