No Subject
Hello LAME Developers, I was just wondering if anyone has been to able build the GTK version of LAME 3.87. I have tried with the makefile for MSVC and by using the project files. I have gotten the same error in both cases: c:\lame-beta\src\lame3.87\main.c(154) : error C4013: 'lame_decoder' undefined; assuming extern returning int This only happens, when I use the HAVEGTK option. I have no idea how to go about fixing this. Perhaps I have missed something. Has anyone else be getting this error? Thanks for any help, Nathan D. Blomquist http://www.win32lame.com -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
No Subject
Hello , Warning: Unable to connect to ORACLE (ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve service name) in /usr/htdocs/mydomain-reds/index.php3 on line 241 Fatal error: Call to unsupported or undefined function () in /usr/htdocs/mydomain-reds/index.php3 on line 243 Best regards, r3mix.net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- up-to-date ripper encoder info and the truth about MP3 quality - http://www.r3mix.net or http://r3mixnet.cjb.net -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
No Subject
Hi, Sorry for this not totally MP3-encoder-related mail, but I was wondering if anyone had some pointers to web sites, books etc. I could check out to learn some basics on audio coding. I'm particularly interested in the mathematical side of it. I want to start simple, eg. writing small programs to downsample, halve sample size etc. Basically introductory tutorials, any sort of books which describe in detail basic audio compression like ADPCM would be really helpful. Preferably stuff that doesn't assume you have knowledge of audio coding terminology etc. (I have no idea what a scalefactor is, etc. :) Regards, Adam Whitehead Netherworld Media E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +61 (889) 279 898 FAX: +61 (889) 273 889 AudioPhilez (http://www.audiophilez.com) -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
No Subject
Where can I get the frame analyzer for a Win98 platform? I am no programmerand I have no idea how to compile the sourcecode
No Subject
There is a lot of talk about Blade being better than FhG at higher bitrates. I would like to hear some opinions about that. Also how does Lame fit into all of this? As I understand it, Lame should be better than Blade at low bitrates, but is this also true for higher bitrates?
No Subject
There is a lot of talk about Blade being better than FhG at higher bitrates. I would like to hear some opinions about that. Also how does Lame fit into all of this? As I understand it, Lame should be better than Blade at low bitrates, but is this also true for higher bitrates? -=- MIME -=- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0015_01BF1ADC.7F5EA6A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is a lot of talk about Blade being better than FhG at higher = bitrates. I would like to hear some opinions about that. Also how does Lame fit = into all of this? As I understand it, Lame should be better than Blade at low bitrates, = but is this also true for higher bitrates? --=_NextPart_000_0015_01BF1ADC.7F5EA6A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" HTMLHEAD META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODY bgColor=3D#ff DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2There is a lot of talk about Blade = being better=20 than FhG at higher bitrates./FONT/DIV DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2I would like to hear some opinions = about that. Also=20 how does Lame fit into all of this?/FONT/DIV DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2As I understand it, Lame should be = better than=20 Blade at low bitrates, but is this also true for/FONT/DIV DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2higher bitrates?/FONT/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV/BODY/HTML --=_NextPart_000_0015_01BF1ADC.7F5EA6A0-- -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ ) do you really want to know, or is this just a troll? :-) As far as I can tell, Blade produces output of the same quality as the ISO code. LAME is also based on the ISO code, but with many bugfixes (some quite serious) and some of our own improvements in the psychoacoustics/bit allocation. The bugfixes can only improve the quality at *any* bitrate. But as for our own improvements, most are based on listening tests done at 128kbs, so it is remotely possible they have made reduced the higher bitrate quality. Mark -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
