However, I do not provide binaries and I state in the readme
Please note that parts of this software can be under patent
right restrictions and thus cannot be used freely in some
countries., but I got a letter about patent infringements
which demands to stop all distribution of
Hi,
Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
You can definitively publish source code only.
I received the same kind of letter from Dolby about AAC source code,
explaining that they could even sue me.
I responded back that source code is fully legal, and that I'll never remove
the source code. It was
Gabriel,
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Bouvigne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] [ot]patent issues and open source
You can definitively publish source code only.
I received the same kind of letter from
Where did you get the information that source code is fully
legal?
The source code itself doesn't do anything. It's just a written description
of something. The description of a patent is publicaly available, as it's
the principle of patents. So another description is as legal as the patent
Slightly off-topic, but if I remember correctly, Dolby also demanded
from
NetBSD to cease distribution of AC3DEC software, which is a source-code
of
the AC-3 decoder implementation. In their warning letter (also signed by
Christy Bonner) they said that Dolby has all intellectual rights
hi,
I get this segfault whenever I try to encode with lame 3.91:
Current directory is /home/felix/src/lame-3.91/frontend/
GNU gdb 19990928
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or
I am new to this list and hope that I am not breaking with list etiquette by
this post. Anyway, here goes...
I have been working on a CD Ripper for Windows for the past several weeks. I
have reached the point where it is at or very close to a beta code base. I
have set up a home page for the
¿ñ׬ÃÀÔª,¾ÙÊÖÖ®ÀÍ!!!
×îÐÂÏûÏ¢£ºÃÀ¹úÓÖÒ»¼ÒÖøÃû¹«Ë¾¿ªÊ¼°ÚÀ«ÁË£¬Ã¿½éÉÜÒ»È˽øÍøÕ¾×¢²á±ã¿É»ñµÃ50ÃÀÔª,
¶ÔÖйúÓû§¿ª·Å£¡£¡È¥ÄêÃÀ¹úÔÚÏ߸ã¹ýÒ»´Î£¬Ò²ÊÇÿ·¢Õ¹Ò»¸ö»áÔ±50ÃÀÔª¡£ÏóÕâÑùµÄ
³¬¼¶¹«Ë¾£¬ÇøÇø¼¸¸öÃÀÔª¶ÔËüÃÇÓÖËãµÃÁËʲô£¬¿ÖŲ»Ê±µÄ³öÀ´°Ú°ÚÀ«£¬ÏÔʾÆä°ÔÖ÷
On 28 Jan, Martin Faxér wrote:
I personally don't think that you will have a problem with the output
quality of GOGO, but if you do, I guess you can check out LAME (although
GOGO is supposed to be based on it).
GOGO is based upon an older version of LAME, I don't know if they ported
recent
MP3 Pro is only good for getting mediocre quality mp3s at low bitrates, and
WMA files often have a time limit attached cannot be transferred.
How about we NOT move on?
== Originally sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
Hi just some comments. I think mp3 is going obsolete pretty
Good idea, but I'm afraid that doing only this it would still miss:
*very short tones (less than 3 granules long)
*tones rapidly changing of freqs (sweeps)
But yes, doing forward and backward prediction is a good idea.
Well.. there are several alternative methods, check out the method
MP3 - has some (I believe) serious design flaws which the LAME
developers and others have been trying to eliminate
MP3Pro - Only really aimed at low bit rates
MP3plus - Looks like a good format... the developer *seems* to have
taken the good stuff out of MP3 and added
12 matches
Mail list logo
